Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/pinta.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/pinta-0.1-1.20100227git.fc12.src.rpm Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2018110 Description: This package is another one intended for the Design Suite.
Pinta 0.2 is available. Please update.
Ayup, you're right! Thanks for the heads-up. Here's the updated package. Anybody up for a review? Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/pinta.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/pinta-0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm
It seems the icons are taken from paintdotnet 3.0. In this case they are not an acceptable content for Fedora because they are licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND. Please read: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-February/msg00024.html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497766 Please verify upstream if needed.
Thanks for the heads-up! I inquired with upstream early when packaging it and upstream added a line saying "Pinta does not use the Paint.NET logo or icon mentioned above." back then. This is also the reason why I packaged originally a GIT checkout, instead of version 0.1 (which didn't contain this note). Here's the link to the file, which should be in 0.2 now: http://github.com/jpobst/Pinta/blob/master/license-pdn.txt
*** Bug 578701 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Package do not work on 64 bits system. You are wrongly supposing that %{_libdir} is always /usr/lib. From the Mono guidelines: "Mono installs binaries in %{_libdir}/<package>/bin with symlinks back to /usr/bin.". You didn't use %{_libdir}/<package>/bin but %{_libdir}/<package>. Please use another name for the icon. Now you use applications-graphics.png and it is too generic and therefore it could conflict with other packages. You should also add todo.txt to the docs. You may also want to have a look at the Debian package for patches and other improvements (for example, the desktop file): http://patch-tracker.debian.org/package/pinta/0.2-1
Ping.
Pinta 0.3 is out: http://pinta-project.com/release/0.3 Are you still interested in this review request?
I've been rotating around here while working out some parts of 'life' as marked here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Vacation :) While I still think that Pinta is a cool application, I might not be able to continue to give it the attention it deserves. If somebody wants to package it, I'm willing to act as co-maintainer, though.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 590244 ***