Bug 593235

Summary: Drop the redhat-lsb dependency
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Rahul Sundaram <metherid>
Component: mumbleAssignee: Andreas Osowski <th0br0>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 14CC: j.golderer, kevin, supercyper1, th0br0
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: mumble-1.2.2-10.fc14 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-27 08:47:06 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Rahul Sundaram 2010-05-18 09:29:15 UTC
Description of problem:

You didn't respond to

http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-May/136329.html

The redhat-lsb package should never be added as a dependency to any package. 

You should fix the initscript to follow the packaging guidelines

https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/347

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript

Comment 1 Kevin Kofler 2010-05-21 05:46:48 UTC
Also note that the mere presence of an LSB header on the initscript does not 
make the initscript require redhat-lsb. If you're using actual functions 
from LSB, you should be using native functions from our initscript package 
instead where applicable, or just not use those functions.

And finally, please also note that shipping a valid Fedora initscript is the 
responsibility of the packager, just shipping whatever upstream provides 
will NOT cut it in most cases.

Comment 2 Bug Zapper 2010-07-30 11:39:23 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 14 development cycle.
Changing version to '14'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 3 Michael Cronenworth 2010-08-01 00:57:06 UTC
*** Bug 593238 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Kevin Kofler 2010-08-03 03:13:42 UTC
Ping? This is a critical packaging guidelines violation and as such should be addressed in a timely manner. 2+ months is NOT timely!

Comment 5 Andreas Osowski 2010-08-04 03:42:31 UTC
I have pushed an updated version to devel,
Could you please confirm compliance with the guidelines?
Once you've done so, I shall update the other releases.

And sorry again for the problem :(

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2010-08-25 18:55:14 UTC
mumble-1.2.2-10.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mumble-1.2.2-10.fc14

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2010-08-26 02:13:39 UTC
mumble-1.2.2-10.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mumble'.  You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mumble-1.2.2-10.fc14

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2011-03-30 20:04:58 UTC
mumble-1.2.2-10.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.