Bug 599962

Summary: segfault in grubby
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Neal Becker <ndbecker2>
Component: grubbyAssignee: Brian Lane <bcl>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 13CC: bcl, nerijus, pjones
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-06-07 22:59:37 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
anacond.log
none
upgrade.log
none
grub.conf none

Description Neal Becker 2010-06-03 21:07:57 UTC 
Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Neal Becker 2010-06-03 21:08:50 UTC 
Created attachment 420666 [details]
anacond.log
Comment 2 Neal Becker 2010-06-03 21:09:27 UTC 
Created attachment 420685 [details]
upgrade.log
Comment 3 Neal Becker 2010-06-03 21:10:01 UTC 
Created attachment 420702 [details]
grub.conf
Comment 4 Neal Becker 2010-06-03 21:10:47 UTC 
rpm -q kernel grubby
kernel-2.6.33.5-112.fc13.x86_64
grubby-7.0.13-1.fc13.x86_64
Comment 5 Brian Lane 2010-06-03 23:07:21 UTC 
Relevant part of the log is the backtrace:

grubby recieved SIGSEGV!  Backtrace (9):
/sbin/grubby[0x40805f]
/lib64/libc.so.6(+0x32a40)[0x7f031b820a40]
/lib64/libc.so.6(+0x1279ba)[0x7f031b9159ba]
/sbin/grubby[0x40695e]
/sbin/grubby[0x406b10]
/sbin/grubby[0x406d6d]
/sbin/grubby[0x407ec5]
/lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd)[0x7f031b80cc5d]
/sbin/grubby[0x401709]

This may be related to the suitableImage() bug I just fixed.
Comment 6 Brian Lane 2010-06-03 23:10:40 UTC 
The grub.conf you posted is from a f13 system. Do you still have the f12 version that failed?
Comment 7 Neal Becker 2010-06-03 23:28:48 UTC 
No, but all I changed is edit the version numbers.
Comment 8 Brian Lane 2010-06-07 22:59:37 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 592294 ***