Bug 600892
| Summary: | Xorg fails to start on "Intel Corporation 82G33/G31" when kernel is booted with 'nomodeset' option | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | sudheer <sudheer.divakaran> | ||||
| Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Kernel Maintainer List <kernel-maint> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | low | ||||||
| Version: | 13 | CC: | ajax, anton, awilliam, bskeggs, dougsland, gansalmon, itamar, jonathan, kernel-maint, peterscott, xgl-maint | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | ia64 | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2010-10-25 21:16:35 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
sudheer
2010-06-06 14:55:00 UTC
this is expected and intended behaviour in F13, the use of nomodeset is no longer supported with the intel driver. perhaps we should make the 'nomodeset' option a no-op with intel and nouveau, and print a warning in logs somewhere? re-assigning to kernel with ajax and ben CC'ed for input. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers *** Bug 600949 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** I guess we could have some kind of message printed in the logs somewhere, I'd like to keep "nomodeset" however, as it's very useful in those situations where we fail to initialise the display for whatever reason. I'm not sure what you mean...how is it useful, when the X driver can't work with it? What's the point of loading nouveau with nomodeset versus just not loading it at all? Does it help for diagnostics somehow? -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers Or do you just mean that it makes handling the situation easier for users, because it's easier to just put in 'nomodeset' than it is to actually disable the module? -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers We should fall back to vesa magically when you say "nomodeset" now. |