Bug 614297
Summary: | Review Request: meegotouch-theme - Theme for Meego Touch based applications | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Chen Lei <supercyper1> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, jreznik, otto.liljalaakso |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2021-05-22 00:45:23 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 632051 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 201449 |
Description
Chen Lei
2010-07-14 03:40:56 UTC
Note: This package should be reviewed before libmeegotou even it depends on it, because libmeegotouch also depends on meegotouch-theme. s/it depends on it/it depends on libmeegotouch Could you send the link to libmeegotouch review? (In reply to comment #1) > Note: This package should be reviewed before libmeegotou even it depends on it, > because libmeegotouch also depends on meegotouch-theme. Sounds like circular dependency. On the other, you should not Require libmeegoutouch explicitely. (In reply to comment #3) > Could you send the link to libmeegotouch review? I still waiting a review for libqttracker which is a dependency for libmeegotouch. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614075 (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Note: This package should be reviewed before libmeegotou even it depends on it, > > because libmeegotouch also depends on meegotouch-theme. > Sounds like circular dependency. On the other, you should not Require > libmeegoutouch explicitely. I think yum is smart enough to solve circular dependency :) But you still should not Require it explicitly? Or is there any reason to do it so? (In reply to comment #6) > But you still should not Require it explicitly? Or is there any reason to do it > so? The upstream rpm depends on libmeegotouch, I'll take a look at it if this dependency is necessary. Fedora has different packaging guidelines than MeeGo. (In reply to comment #8) > Fedora has different packaging guidelines than MeeGo. It seems meegotouch-theme depends on libmeegotouch because of %{_sysconfdir}/xdg/autostart/mthemedaemon.desktop. Actually, there are many circular dependency in fedora(e.g. phonon and phonon-backend). New upstream release: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/meegotouch-theme.spec http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/meegotouch-theme-0.20.29-1.fc13.src.rpm This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the submitter to proceed with the review. If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take this ticket. Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted. This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket reviewer failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we reset the status and the assignee of this ticket. This review request is very old. If so, I can do the review, please provide new urls for the specfile and srpm, the old ones are stale. If you are not interested anymore, either close this issue or do nothing, in which case automation should close this issue in one month. This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it. |