Bug 614577

Summary:	installbrand -> install_brand syntax change after rebase in F12?
Product:	[Community] Publican	Reporter:	Steve Bonneville <sbonnevi>
Component:	publican	Assignee:	Jeff Fearn 🐞 <jfearn>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	1.6	CC:	jfearn, mmcallis, nb, publican-list, rlandman
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-07-14 23:10:43 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Steve Bonneville 2010-07-14 19:24:48 UTC

Description of problem:

Change in CLI syntax from Publican 1.6.3 (publican installbrand) to
Publican 2.1.0 (publican install_brand) broke existing script after
rebase in Fedora 12.  Not that I'm arguing with the syntax change, 
but it was a surprise.

Likely to affect F13 or other distributions where rebase happened.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
publican-2.1-0.fc12.noarch

Comment 1 Ruediger Landmann 2010-07-14 23:10:43 UTC

Hi Steve --

Sorry for the inconvenience; installbrand was one of a small number of actions that was named inconsistently with other publican actions where words are separated by underscores; we cleaned this up in Publican 2. I think the inconsistency was first pointed up on the Publican mailing list, but if so, I can't seem to find that post now.

Refer to Bug 581090 for the list of actions renamed in Publican 2. 

Cheers
Rudi