Bug 614577 - installbrand -> install_brand syntax change after rebase in F12?
Summary: installbrand -> install_brand syntax change after rebase in F12?
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Publican
Classification: Community
Component: publican
Version: 1.6
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jeff Fearn 🐞
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-07-14 19:24 UTC by Steve Bonneville
Modified: 2010-11-24 04:17 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-07-14 23:10:43 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 581090 0 low CLOSED inconsistent action naming style 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Description Steve Bonneville 2010-07-14 19:24:48 UTC 
Description of problem:

Change in CLI syntax from Publican 1.6.3 (publican installbrand) to
Publican 2.1.0 (publican install_brand) broke existing script after
rebase in Fedora 12.  Not that I'm arguing with the syntax change, 
but it was a surprise.

Likely to affect F13 or other distributions where rebase happened.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
publican-2.1-0.fc12.noarch
Comment 1 Ruediger Landmann 2010-07-14 23:10:43 UTC 
Hi Steve --

Sorry for the inconvenience; installbrand was one of a small number of actions that was named inconsistently with other publican actions where words are separated by underscores; we cleaned this up in Publican 2. I think the inconsistency was first pointed up on the Publican mailing list, but if so, I can't seem to find that post now.

Refer to Bug 581090 for the list of actions renamed in Publican 2. 

Cheers
Rudi
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.