Bug 616626

Summary:	python-pip pkg conflict with perl-pip
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Adam Stokes <astokes>
Component:	perl-pip	Assignee:	Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	mmaslano, perl-devel, phalliday
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	616399	Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-08-04 08:21:27 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	616399
Bug Blocks:

Description Adam Stokes 2010-07-21 01:44:54 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #616399 +++

Description of problem:
Attempting to do a wildcard install of both python and perl packages results a file conflict for both python-pip and perl-pip

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
python-pip 0.6.3-1 & perl-pip 1.16-1

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install python* perl*
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
Running Transaction Test


Transaction Check Error:
  file /usr/bin/pip conflicts between attempted installs of python-pip-0.6.3-1.fc13.noarch and perl-pip-1.16-1.fc13.noarch


Expected results:
No conflicts

Additional info:


--- Additional comment from phalliday on 2010-07-20 14:26:35 EDT ---

Well, I think the Debian approach (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=551926) should be done here.  Both packages should have to rename their /usr/bin/pip.  Something like /usr/bin/pip-perl and /usr/bin/pip-python.  That way completion will work at least.

Comment 1 Marcela Mašláňová 2010-07-21 07:11:09 UTC

Thanks for your bug report. I've created bug report in upstream as stated in our guidelines [1]. Let's wait for a while for their opinion.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Conflicts#Binary_Name_Conflicts

Comment 2 Bug Zapper 2010-07-30 12:43:08 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 14 development cycle.
Changing version to '14'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 3 Marcela Mašláňová 2010-08-03 12:20:46 UTC

No reply from upstream yet and also python pip wasn't still fixed.

Comment 4 Peter Halliday 2010-08-03 13:32:38 UTC

I haven't fixed this yet, because I'm waiting to hear what was going to happen with the perl-pip.  I doubt they will change, because both parties upstream had this "battle" debian.  And the packages had to rename them to pip-perl and pip-python, because neither would change their name.  I certainly am willing to make the changes, but I want to make sure both were planned to be changed.

Comment 5 Marcela Mašláňová 2010-08-04 08:21:27 UTC

Ok, I read the whole fight about who was here first with pip... It's ridiculous. 

Let's both change it to python-pip and perl-pip for rawhide. In my case only perl-Padre is using pip and it looks to be working even after rename.

Build with fix:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2378618