Bug 616399 - python-pip pkg conflict with perl-pip
Summary: python-pip pkg conflict with perl-pip
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-pip
Version: 14
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tim Flink
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 616626
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-07-20 11:05 UTC by Adam Stokes
Modified: 2011-06-24 15:17 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 616626 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-06-24 15:17:35 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Adam Stokes 2010-07-20 11:05:25 UTC
Description of problem:
Attempting to do a wildcard install of both python and perl packages results a file conflict for both python-pip and perl-pip

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
python-pip 0.6.3-1 & perl-perl 1.16-1

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install python* perl*
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
Running Transaction Test


Transaction Check Error:
  file /usr/bin/pip conflicts between attempted installs of python-pip-0.6.3-1.fc13.noarch and perl-pip-1.16-1.fc13.noarch


Expected results:
No conflicts

Additional info:

Comment 1 Peter Halliday 2010-07-20 17:32:36 UTC
Not sure how this is going to be resolved.  Both packages require the same filename.  I'm consulting with the upstream people. However, you almost never should do a yum install python* or yum install perl*, because you usually shouldn't install everything.  But the last comment is more editorial.

Comment 2 Adam Stokes 2010-07-20 18:19:17 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Not sure how this is going to be resolved.  Both packages require the same
> filename.  I'm consulting with the upstream people. 

Thanks
> However, you almost never
> should do a yum install python* or yum install perl*, because you usually
> shouldn't install everything.  But the last comment is more editorial.    

Agreed, however, for completeness sake we should not be running into packages that could potentially overwrite other packages executables.

Thanks for looking into this!

Comment 3 Peter Halliday 2010-07-20 18:26:35 UTC
Well, I think the Debian approach (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=551926) should be done here.  Both packages should have to rename their /usr/bin/pip.  Something like /usr/bin/pip-perl and /usr/bin/pip-python.  That way completion will work at least.

Comment 4 Adam Stokes 2010-07-20 18:49:15 UTC
I like it, should I file a duplicate bug for perl-pip or will you handle that transaction?

Thanks for the quick replies

Comment 5 Peter Halliday 2010-07-20 19:27:41 UTC
I would appreciate it if you file this bug.  For political reasons, I don't want it to look like I'm targeting perl-pip in any way.

Comment 6 Adam Stokes 2010-07-21 01:42:43 UTC
Sure thing thanks again

Comment 7 Bug Zapper 2010-07-30 12:42:18 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 14 development cycle.
Changing version to '14'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 8 Marcela Mašláňová 2010-08-31 12:44:16 UTC
Ping? Perl bug was fixed.

Comment 9 Peter Halliday 2010-08-31 13:12:35 UTC
I'm submitting my fix now.  having some trouble getting to know the new build process now that we're on git.  So should have mine in soon.

Comment 10 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2011-06-22 18:09:05 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 11 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2011-06-22 18:10:12 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 12 Tim Flink 2011-06-24 15:17:35 UTC
This was completed a while ago but the bug was never closed. Closing now.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.