Bug 649537

Summary: [abrt] gvfs-archive-1.6.4-3.fc14: raise: Process /usr/libexec/gvfsd-archive was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: bravoure09
Component: gvfsAssignee: Tomáš Bžatek <tbzatek>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 14CC: alexl, andrew.kavalov, bnocera, christopherthe1, compaq88, contact.saberyari, dimapunk80, e.liger, gatlinsullivan, gileadeg, hopparz, linuxnow, maamoun4188, marivaldosenalimajunior, maximi89, packin_oh, shanewbbr, tbzatek, thompsontrading, tsmetana
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:0cafe201b737370caa829885d307e43a822ef175
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-03-30 12:04:49 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description bravoure09 2010-11-03 22:18:49 UTC
abrt version: 1.1.13
architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/libexec/gvfsd-archive 'file=/home/honore/T\xc3\xa9l\xc3\xa9chargements/Fedora-14-x86_64-DVD.iso'
component: gvfs
crash_function: raise
executable: /usr/libexec/gvfsd-archive
kernel: 2.6.35.6-48.fc14.x86_64
package: gvfs-archive-1.6.4-3.fc14
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/gvfsd-archive was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)
time: 1288822344
uid: 500

Comment 1 bravoure09 2010-11-03 22:18:51 UTC
Created attachment 457604 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 James 2010-11-07 13:47:43 UTC
Package: gvfs-archive-1.6.4-3.fc14
Architecture: x86_64
OS Release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)


How to reproduce
-----
1. Attempted to mount an ISO image.
2. Not sure if the ISO is good as I am still installing packages to a fresh install of F14 x86_64
3.

Comment 3 contact.saberyari 2010-11-07 20:22:58 UTC
Package: gvfs-archive-1.6.4-3.fc14
Architecture: x86_64
OS Release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)


How to reproduce
-----
1.don't know
2.
3.

Comment 4 Zoltan Hoppar 2010-11-09 03:19:23 UTC
Package: gvfs-archive-1.6.4-3.fc14
Architecture: i686
OS Release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)


How to reproduce
-----
1. Downloaded the iso with firefox
2. After succedssfull download - tried to doubleclick on it to open
3. crash

Comment 5 gatlibs 2010-11-13 19:35:48 UTC
Package: gvfs-archive-1.6.4-3.fc14
Architecture: x86_64
OS Release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)


How to reproduce
-----
1. Try to open an .iso file to view its contents.
2.
3.

Comment 6 NM 2010-11-15 15:06:19 UTC
Package: gvfs-archive-1.6.4-3.fc14
Architecture: x86_64
OS Release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)


How to reproduce
-----
Clicked CLEAR after downloading Fedora

Comment
-----
abrt detected crash.

Comment 7 Eric Liger 2010-11-15 21:27:12 UTC
Package: gvfs-archive-1.6.4-3.fc14
Architecture: i686
OS Release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)


How to reproduce
-----
1.ouverture d un dossier d archive
2.
3.

Comment 8 Francisco J. Granados 2010-11-20 17:03:39 UTC
Package: gvfs-archive-1.6.4-3.fc14
Architecture: i686
OS Release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)


How to reproduce
-----
1.trying to open a folder while upgrading system
2.
3.

Comment 9 Francisco J. Granados 2010-11-21 12:46:27 UTC
Package: gvfs-archive-1.6.4-3.fc14
Architecture: i686
OS Release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)


How to reproduce
-----
1.trying to open "dowloads" folder

2.
3.

Comment 10 abrt-bot 2012-03-30 12:04:49 UTC
Backtrace analysis found this bug to be similar to bug #658088, closing as duplicate.

Bugs which were found to be similar to this bug: bug #584082, bug #595175, bug #596335, bug #597663, bug #601928, bug #625043, bug #647848, bug #650385, bug #652507, bug #656250, bug #658088, bug #661701, bug #682535, bug #697237

This comment is automatically generated.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 658088 ***