Bug 662743

Summary: RFE: Add a python26-jinja2 package to EPEL5
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: Steve Traylen <steve.traylen>
Component: python-jinja2Assignee: Luke Macken <lmacken>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: el5CC: lmacken, pfrields, thomas.moschny
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-03-03 09:29:16 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 657790, 662739, 668591, 675628    
Bug Blocks: 662750    
Attachments:
Description Flags
F15 spec file adapted for python26-jinja2 in EPEL5 none

Description Steve Traylen 2010-12-13 19:10:18 UTC 
Hi, 

I like to see python26-jinga2 package in EPEL5.

This is currently not possible due to missing dependencies but I'll try
to provide some patches once it it is unblocked.
Comment 1 Thomas Moschny 2011-01-13 11:58:50 UTC 
Is there a consensus on whether we should create py26 subpackages from the main packages or have completely separate specfiles?
Comment 2 Steve Traylen 2011-01-13 12:25:23 UTC 
Hi Thomas, 

Both  options are quite possible and it depends on a few factors:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Common_SRPM_vs_split_SRPMs

A cursory look I see you have same version in EPEL5 and rawhide and your rawhide
already has a python3 variant.

As such if it were me adding a with_python26 option makes a lot of sense. I'm happy to provide
a patch once the markupsafe is in place.
Comment 3 Steve Traylen 2011-01-26 21:59:47 UTC 
Hi Thomas,

> A cursory look I see you have same version in EPEL5 and rawhide and your
> rawhide
> already has a python3 variant.

I was mistaken here , I now see that EPEL5 is 2.2.1 where as devel is
2.5.5.

I am unsure of the significance here but I expect a new python26-jinga2
package probably make sense.

python26-markupsafe is now on its way to the testing repo.

Steve
Comment 4 Steve Traylen 2011-01-27 19:17:12 UTC 
Created attachment 475667 [details]
F15 spec file adapted for python26-jinja2 in EPEL5

 
This is a python26-jinja2 .spec file suitable for EPEL5.

I am hoping you might like to submit it for review... Once you have checked it of course.

Steve.
Comment 5 Thomas Moschny 2011-01-28 16:04:48 UTC 
(In reply to comment #4)
> This is a python26-jinja2 .spec file suitable for EPEL5.
> 
> I am hoping you might like to submit it for review... Once you have checked it
> of course.

Will do so, but I'm currently a busy, so not before end of next week.
Comment 6 Thomas Moschny 2011-03-03 09:29:16 UTC 
python26-jinja2-2.5.5-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository.