Bug 664881

Summary: [abrt] gvfs-1.7.0-1.fc15: Process /usr/libexec/gvfsd-metadata was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Matěj Cepl <mcepl>
Component: gvfsAssignee: Tomáš Bžatek <tbzatek>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: alexl, bnocera, mcepl, tbzatek, tsmetana
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:bed3e6d9992ca5c4e2df77c86a89b42898502290
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-03-30 14:14:20 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description Matěj Cepl 2010-12-22 00:47:29 UTC 
abrt version: 1.1.14
architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/libexec/gvfsd-metadata
component: gvfs
executable: /usr/libexec/gvfsd-metadata
kernel: 2.6.37-0.rc6.git0.1.fc15.x86_64
package: gvfs-1.7.0-1.fc15
reason: Process /usr/libexec/gvfsd-metadata was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 15 (Rawhide)
time: 1292978544
uid: 500

How to reproduce
-----
1.no idea, it happened some time ago.
2.
3.
Comment 1 Matěj Cepl 2010-12-22 00:47:32 UTC 
Created attachment 470106 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 abrt-bot 2012-03-30 14:14:20 UTC 
Backtrace analysis found this bug to be similar to bug #699109, closing as duplicate.

Bugs which were found to be similar to this bug: bug #532324, bug #533846, bug #541446, bug #541651, bug #543288, bug #546863, bug #550337, bug #550639, bug #555586, bug #558028, bug #559637, bug #562361, bug #567851, bug #570048, bug #578707, bug #583968, bug #585555, bug #591961, bug #601742, bug #607757, bug #619133, bug #626621, bug #628053, bug #635723, bug #636862, bug #649074, bug #650065, bug #657047, bug #657917, bug #663742, bug #669950, bug #683625, bug #684525, bug #693099, bug #698527, bug #699109

This comment is automatically generated.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 699109 ***