Bug 665420

Summary: [abrt] gvfs-1.6.6-1.fc14: g_vfs_backend_ftp_finalize: Process /usr/libexec/gvfsd-ftp was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Peque <msdeleonpeque>
Component: gvfsAssignee: Tomáš Bžatek <tbzatek>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 14CC: alexl, bnocera, mail, tbzatek, tsmetana
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:668da43f63bb5eb936fc5db51e4d1d99c8e98af7
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-03-30 12:07:06 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description Peque 2010-12-23 18:11:37 UTC 
abrt version: 1.1.14
architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/libexec/gvfsd-ftp --spawner :1.10 /org/gtk/gvfs/exec_spaw/7
component: gvfs
crash_function: g_vfs_backend_ftp_finalize
executable: /usr/libexec/gvfsd-ftp
kernel: 2.6.35.9-64.fc14.x86_64
package: gvfs-1.6.6-1.fc14
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/gvfsd-ftp was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)
How to reproduce: Can't add any info...
time: 1293127814
uid: 500
Comment 1 Peque 2010-12-23 18:11:40 UTC 
Created attachment 470457 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Felix Möller 2011-01-23 11:45:57 UTC 
This might be a duplicate of bug #666155

They both share:
    0x7f4b78010680 "ERROR:gvfsbackendftp.c:327:g_vfs_backend_ftp_finalize:
assertion failed: (ftp->queue == NULL)"
Comment 3 Peque 2011-02-09 19:54:26 UTC 
Package: gvfs-1.6.6-1.fc14
Architecture: x86_64
OS Release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)


How to reproduce
-----
Don't know how it happened...
Comment 4 abrt-bot 2012-03-30 12:07:06 UTC 
Backtrace analysis found this bug to be similar to bug #660685, closing as duplicate.

Bugs which were found to be similar to this bug: bug #555543, bug #557545, bug #563400, bug #568321, bug #568800, bug #570988, bug #573775, bug #579236, bug #583813, bug #585665, bug #595077, bug #605394, bug #612715, bug #625539, bug #628271, bug #630489, bug #639139, bug #645630, bug #646016, bug #655297, bug #657604, bug #660685, bug #663185, bug #663270, bug #667709, bug #692951, bug #697233, bug #709121, bug #728496

This comment is automatically generated.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 660685 ***