Bug 68134
Summary: | RFE: Please reinclude elm | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Public Beta | Reporter: | Bernd Bartmann <bernd.bartmann> |
Component: | elm | Assignee: | Trond Eivind Glomsrxd <teg> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Ben Levenson <benl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | limbo | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2002-07-07 20:41:15 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Bernd Bartmann
2002-07-06 20:00:18 UTC
As a long-time user of "elm" I have switched to PINE ages ago as my primary mail client. You might want to do the same. Since then I've used elm only rarely for automated posting of MIME attachments. See e.g. bug #49566. elm is pretty much unmaintained, afaik, and not up-to-date with regard to modern e-mail features. I would recommend adding it back in. I know of a friend who still uses it and will complain when it disappears. Another good alternative to elm is mutt. It's way too outdated and doesn't support the last decades of email standards. We also ship many other email clients. |