Bug 683625
| Summary: | [abrt] gvfs-1.6.4-2.fc14: verify_metadata_block: Process /usr/libexec/gvfsd-metadata was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Mustafa Qasim <alajal> | ||||
| Component: | gvfs | Assignee: | Tomáš Bžatek <tbzatek> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 14 | CC: | ajk4, alexl, bnocera, tbzatek, tsmetana | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | abrt_hash:3abf2c3b6de25243a8be1325d1a1586cfde1cc3a | ||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2012-03-30 14:15:13 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Mustafa Qasim
2011-03-09 21:27:13 UTC
Created attachment 483310 [details]
File: backtrace
I had symptoms of this type after a not very smooth upgrade to fedora 14 from fedora 13. In my case the problem was alleviated by changing various permissions in sub-directories of the user home directories: .gnome; .gnome2; .gconf; .gconfd; Perhaps my experience will be helpful. Backtrace analysis found this bug to be similar to bug #699109, closing as duplicate. Bugs which were found to be similar to this bug: bug #532324, bug #533846, bug #541446, bug #541651, bug #543288, bug #546863, bug #550337, bug #550639, bug #555586, bug #558028, bug #559637, bug #562361, bug #567851, bug #570048, bug #578707, bug #583968, bug #585555, bug #591961, bug #601742, bug #607757, bug #619133, bug #626621, bug #628053, bug #635723, bug #636862, bug #649074, bug #650065, bug #657047, bug #657917, bug #663742, bug #664881, bug #669950, bug #684525, bug #693099, bug #698527, bug #699109 This comment is automatically generated. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 699109 *** |