Bug 6938

Summary: Python interpreter throws SIGSEGV during upgrade procedure
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Philip Hisley <pnh>
Component: installerAssignee: Matt Wilson <msw>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.1   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2000-02-22 16:09:12 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Philip Hisley 1999-11-12 00:16:55 UTC
Attempting to upgrade a running 5.2 Redhat Linux system to 6.1 using
RedHat 6.1 distribution. During the initial part of the upgrade when the
RPM database is being rebuilt, the Python interpreter throws a segment
violation:

"Python SIGSEGV Received at PC 0xb in PID 23"

The upgrade process then terminates.

Comment 1 Philip Hisley 1999-11-12 03:47:59 UTC
Problem Solved.

This problem appears to be related to one of two factors:
1. The RPM database was corrupted  -or-
2. There was not enough room in the root partition to rebuild the RPM databse

To solve the problem I deleted files to make room in order to rebuild the RPM
database. I then rebuilt the RPM database from the console prompt. Upon
rebooting the system and rerunning the upgrade procedure everything went fine
-- excpet for the fact that the upgrade procedure overwrote the MBR witout
asking and clobbered my mulit-boot handler (BootMagic).

It would appear that the Python interpreter/script does not exit gracefully
upon encountering the problems indicated above.

This bug appears to be similar in nature to Bug reports 5545 and 5705.

Comment 2 Jay Turner 1999-11-29 20:11:59 UTC
This issue has been forwarded to a developer for further action.

Comment 3 Jay Turner 1999-11-29 20:37:59 UTC
*** Bug 6913 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Jay Turner 2000-02-22 16:09:59 UTC
Error handling is vastly improved in the latest installer (available in beta) so
that should help out with problems like this.