Bug 70449

Summary: update-agent fails on Intel Solaris platforms
Product: [Retired] Stronghold Cross Platform Reporter: Gary Benson <gbenson>
Component: update-agentAssignee: Gary Benson <gbenson>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Stronghold Engineering List <stronghold-eng-list>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4.0CC: stronghold-eng-list
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-08-01 15:02:34 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Transcript of the failure
none
Workaround none

Description Gary Benson 2002-08-01 14:53:59 UTC 
Description of Problem:
The rpms on Intel Solaris platforms have an architecture of 'i86pc', whereas rpm
on that platform thinks it's architecture is 'i386' as a result of fixing
#57182.  This causes update-agent to fail (see attached example).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
update-agent-1.1-1

How Reproducible:
Always

Additional Information:
This problem can be worked around by saving the attached file as
<ServerRoot>/conf/update-agent.conf.
Comment 1 Gary Benson 2002-08-01 14:56:02 UTC 
Created attachment 68204 [details]
Transcript of the failure
Comment 2 Gary Benson 2002-08-01 14:57:27 UTC 
Created attachment 68205 [details]
Workaround
Comment 3 Gary Benson 2002-09-02 10:56:00 UTC 
Fixed in 40c
Comment 4 Joe Orton 2002-09-02 12:18:11 UTC 
An errata has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. 
This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen 
this bug report if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2002-171.html
Comment 5 Gary Benson 2002-12-05 11:47:56 UTC 
*** Bug 79008 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***