Bug 707232

Summary: Support JON server co-ordination
Product: [Other] RHQ Project Reporter: Charles Crouch <ccrouch>
Component: No ComponentAssignee: RHQ Project Maintainer <rhq-maint>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Mike Foley <mfoley>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 4.0.0CC: hbrock, hrupp
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On: 730088, 730092, 730335, 731587    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Charles Crouch 2011-05-24 09:14:46 EDT
This is a tracking issue to cover the effort of keeping two distinct JON server installs insync with each other. Details are here:
Comment 1 Charles Crouch 2011-05-24 09:15:06 EDT
(7:21:51 AM) ccrouch: lkrejci: can you point me at your wiki pages that talk about the JON Server co-ordination/sync stuff you were working on
(7:22:35 AM) lkrejci: ccrouch: http://wiki.rhq-project.org/display/RHQ/Design+-+Configuration+synchronization
(7:22:51 AM) ccrouch: great thanks
(7:22:58 AM) lkrejci: but it's not been updated with the results of the discussion we had on the last config sync meeting
(7:23:21 AM) lkrejci: I have the minutes from that locally and it should be on some ehterpad that I lost track of...
(7:23:33 AM) ccrouch: what could possibly go wrong
(7:24:05 AM) ccrouch: lkrejci: yeah, lets get this page update when you can, otherwise I will completely forget what we decided :-)
(7:24:54 AM) ccrouch: the one thing i do remember is that "the new way" was going to be much simpler and quicker to implement right :-)
(7:25:41 AM) lkrejci: ccrouch: yeah.. we decided to redefine dry-run as a semantic check without actually "running" anything