Bug 707232 - Support JON server co-ordination
Support JON server co-ordination
Status: NEW
Product: RHQ Project
Classification: Other
Component: No Component (Show other bugs)
4.0.0
Unspecified Unspecified
high Severity unspecified (vote)
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: RHQ Project Maintainer
Mike Foley
:
Depends On: 730088 730092 730335 731587
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2011-05-24 09:14 EDT by Charles Crouch
Modified: 2015-02-01 18:28 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Charles Crouch 2011-05-24 09:14:46 EDT
This is a tracking issue to cover the effort of keeping two distinct JON server installs insync with each other. Details are here:
http://wiki.rhq-project.org/display/RHQ/Design+-+Configuration+synchronization
Comment 1 Charles Crouch 2011-05-24 09:15:06 EDT
(7:21:51 AM) ccrouch: lkrejci: can you point me at your wiki pages that talk about the JON Server co-ordination/sync stuff you were working on
(7:22:35 AM) lkrejci: ccrouch: http://wiki.rhq-project.org/display/RHQ/Design+-+Configuration+synchronization
(7:22:51 AM) ccrouch: great thanks
(7:22:58 AM) lkrejci: but it's not been updated with the results of the discussion we had on the last config sync meeting
(7:23:21 AM) lkrejci: I have the minutes from that locally and it should be on some ehterpad that I lost track of...
(7:23:33 AM) ccrouch: what could possibly go wrong
(7:24:05 AM) ccrouch: lkrejci: yeah, lets get this page update when you can, otherwise I will completely forget what we decided :-)
(7:24:54 AM) ccrouch: the one thing i do remember is that "the new way" was going to be much simpler and quicker to implement right :-)
(7:25:41 AM) lkrejci: ccrouch: yeah.. we decided to redefine dry-run as a semantic check without actually "running" anything

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.