Bug 73073

Summary: FOS not running correctly
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1 Reporter: Sébastien BONNET <sbt>
Component: piranhaAssignee: Lon Hohberger <lhh>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Cluster QE <mspqa-list>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 2.1CC: pamadio, tao
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-08-02 21:07:14 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Patch correcting type (send_str -> send_program) none

Description Sébastien BONNET 2002-08-30 12:38:00 UTC 
Description of Problem:
fos does not correctly handle the send_program config directive which badly 
alters failover capabilities


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.7.0


How Reproducible:
Anytime when using a send_program. Alter util.c and uncomment piranha_log in 
logArgv. Start pulse -v. Watch out the logs and notice that nanny isn't passed 
the right args (everything's missing after -e).


Actual Results:
send_program is not executed, thus fos thinks the service is never available. 
This causes the inactive node to failover anytime.


Expected Results:
When executed on the inactive node, the send_program should notice and report 
back to nanny than the active node is all right.
Comment 1 Sébastien BONNET 2002-08-30 12:39:33 UTC 
Created attachment 73944 [details]
Patch correcting type (send_str -> send_program)
Comment 2 Mike McLean 2003-05-06 23:10:10 UTC 
FOS is being removed from piranha.
Comment 3 Mike McLean 2003-12-09 16:17:59 UTC 
*** Bug 111729 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Lon Hohberger 2004-11-09 18:19:26 UTC 
Info re: patch:

It's a one-line fix which exists in later revisions of piranha. 
No-impact patch.
Comment 8 Lon Hohberger 2005-07-29 16:54:27 UTC 
I added this to the 0.7.11 package, which is expected to go out with U6.
Comment 9 Lon Hohberger 2005-07-29 16:55:53 UTC 
Whoops, that was a RHEL3 update, not 2.1...  Argh.
Comment 10 Lon Hohberger 2005-08-02 21:07:14 UTC 
Not fixing for RHEL2.1