Bug 744881

Summary: tigervnc-server-module-1.1.0-1.fc16 incompatible with current F16 beta
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jonathan Kamens <jik>
Component: tigervncAssignee: Adam Tkac <atkac>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 16CC: atkac, bugzilla-redhat, ovasik
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: tigervnc-1.1.0-2.fc16 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 753216 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-11-13 00:32:00 EST Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 753216    

Description Jonathan Kamens 2011-10-10 14:43:35 EDT
From /var/log/Xorg.0.log:

[    40.532] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libvnc.so
[    40.550] (EE) Failed to load /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libvnc.so: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libvnc.so: undefined symbol: GetMaster
[    40.550] (EE) LoadModule: Module vnc does not have a vncModuleData data object.
[    40.550] (II) UnloadModule: "vnc"
[    40.550] (II) Unloading vnc
[    40.551] (EE) Failed to load module "vnc" (invalid module, 0)
Comment 1 Adam Tkac 2011-10-11 09:18:31 EDT
Thanks for report, there are multiple ways how to fix this bug. The best way is to export the GetMaster() symbol from Xorg, I've just sent the patch[1] to Xorg upstream and if they accept it, I will backport it to Fedora.

[1] http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2011-October/026217.html
Comment 2 Henrique Martins 2011-11-10 10:42:45 EST
This didn't seem to make into the released F16.  Is one of the multiple ways to fix this bug something a simple user can do or do I have to forego tightervnc till then?
Comment 3 Adam Tkac 2011-11-10 10:52:46 EST
(In reply to comment #2)
> This didn't seem to make into the released F16.  Is one of the multiple ways to
> fix this bug something a simple user can do or do I have to forego tightervnc
> till then?

I will release fixed libvnc.so later today or tomorrow.
Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2011-11-11 09:42:52 EST
tigervnc-1.1.0-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tigervnc-1.1.0-2.fc16
Comment 5 Henrique Martins 2011-11-11 10:57:14 EST
Seems to work for both i686 and x86_64.

Cleanup phase of update yields a couple of warnings:

Cleanup    : tigervnc-server-1.1.0-1.fc16.x86_64
Non-fatal POSTUN scriptlet failure in rpm package tigervnc-server-.1.0-1.fc16.x86_64 
Cleanup    : tigervnc-server-minimal-1.1.0-1.fc16.x86_64
warning: %postun(tigervnc-server-1.1.0-1.fc16.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1
Comment 6 Adam Tkac 2011-11-11 11:05:56 EST
(In reply to comment #5)
> Cleanup    : tigervnc-server-1.1.0-1.fc16.x86_64
> Non-fatal POSTUN scriptlet failure in rpm package
> tigervnc-server-.1.0-1.fc16.x86_64 
> Cleanup    : tigervnc-server-minimal-1.1.0-1.fc16.x86_64
> warning: %postun(tigervnc-server-1.1.0-1.fc16.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit
> status 1

This seems like a bug somewhere in the tigervnc-server scriptlets. I will clone this bugreport to track this issue...
Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2011-11-11 22:27:51 EST
Package tigervnc-1.1.0-2.fc16:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing tigervnc-1.1.0-2.fc16'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-15801
then log in and leave karma (feedback).
Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2011-11-13 00:32:00 EST
tigervnc-1.1.0-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.