Bug 744881 - tigervnc-server-module-1.1.0-1.fc16 incompatible with current F16 beta
Summary: tigervnc-server-module-1.1.0-1.fc16 incompatible with current F16 beta
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: tigervnc
Version: 16
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
urgent
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Adam Tkac
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 753216
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-10-10 18:43 UTC by Jonathan Kamens
Modified: 2013-04-30 23:50 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: tigervnc-1.1.0-2.fc16
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 753216 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-11-13 05:32:00 UTC
Type: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jonathan Kamens 2011-10-10 18:43:35 UTC
From /var/log/Xorg.0.log:

[    40.532] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libvnc.so
[    40.550] (EE) Failed to load /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libvnc.so: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libvnc.so: undefined symbol: GetMaster
[    40.550] (EE) LoadModule: Module vnc does not have a vncModuleData data object.
[    40.550] (II) UnloadModule: "vnc"
[    40.550] (II) Unloading vnc
[    40.551] (EE) Failed to load module "vnc" (invalid module, 0)

Comment 1 Adam Tkac 2011-10-11 13:18:31 UTC
Thanks for report, there are multiple ways how to fix this bug. The best way is to export the GetMaster() symbol from Xorg, I've just sent the patch[1] to Xorg upstream and if they accept it, I will backport it to Fedora.

[1] http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2011-October/026217.html

Comment 2 Henrique Martins 2011-11-10 15:42:45 UTC
This didn't seem to make into the released F16.  Is one of the multiple ways to fix this bug something a simple user can do or do I have to forego tightervnc till then?

Comment 3 Adam Tkac 2011-11-10 15:52:46 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> This didn't seem to make into the released F16.  Is one of the multiple ways to
> fix this bug something a simple user can do or do I have to forego tightervnc
> till then?

I will release fixed libvnc.so later today or tomorrow.

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2011-11-11 14:42:52 UTC
tigervnc-1.1.0-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tigervnc-1.1.0-2.fc16

Comment 5 Henrique Martins 2011-11-11 15:57:14 UTC
Seems to work for both i686 and x86_64.

Cleanup phase of update yields a couple of warnings:

Cleanup    : tigervnc-server-1.1.0-1.fc16.x86_64
Non-fatal POSTUN scriptlet failure in rpm package tigervnc-server-.1.0-1.fc16.x86_64 
Cleanup    : tigervnc-server-minimal-1.1.0-1.fc16.x86_64
warning: %postun(tigervnc-server-1.1.0-1.fc16.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1

Comment 6 Adam Tkac 2011-11-11 16:05:56 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> Cleanup    : tigervnc-server-1.1.0-1.fc16.x86_64
> Non-fatal POSTUN scriptlet failure in rpm package
> tigervnc-server-.1.0-1.fc16.x86_64 
> Cleanup    : tigervnc-server-minimal-1.1.0-1.fc16.x86_64
> warning: %postun(tigervnc-server-1.1.0-1.fc16.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit
> status 1

This seems like a bug somewhere in the tigervnc-server scriptlets. I will clone this bugreport to track this issue...

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2011-11-12 03:27:51 UTC
Package tigervnc-1.1.0-2.fc16:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing tigervnc-1.1.0-2.fc16'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-15801
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2011-11-13 05:32:00 UTC
tigervnc-1.1.0-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.