Bug 753864

Summary:	yumdownloader erroneous error message
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Nick Bartle <nick.bartle>
Component:	yum-utils	Assignee:	James Antill <james.antill>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	BaseOS QE Security Team <qe-baseos-security>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.1	CC:	ksrot, pknirsch
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-12-12 11:21:16 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Nick Bartle 2011-11-14 17:39:21 UTC

Description of problem:
using yumdownloader download an rpm - this will work but complain that "already exists and appears to be complete" 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
yum-utils-1.1.30-6

How reproducible:
every time

Steps to Reproduce:
1. in an empty dir run yumdownloader foo
2. receive error message "already exists and appears to be complete"
3. note that dir was empty before download, thus that error is incorrect, although we do now have an rpm
  
Actual results:
rpm with an error about already exists

Expected results:
rpm with only succesful message

Additional info:

Comment 2 Karel Srot 2011-12-12 09:21:09 UTC

Hi,
I believe this is a duplicate of bug 711768 (will be fixed in RHEL6.2).

Nick, 
when running 
yum --showduplicates list PACKAGENAME
you should see that the requested package is available in 2 or more repos.

Comment 3 Nick Bartle 2011-12-12 10:24:09 UTC

Thanks for the info - though I can't view bug 711768 - permission denied?

Comment 4 Karel Srot 2011-12-12 10:43:07 UTC

For RHEL6 it is actually a bug 711767 and it is proposed for RHEL6.3.
I am sorry for confusion.

Comment 5 Nick Bartle 2011-12-12 11:03:36 UTC

Ah yes - I'd agree this bug 753864 is a dupe of 711768, sorry about that.

Comment 6 Karel Srot 2011-12-12 11:21:16 UTC

No problem, thank you for checking it.
Closing this bug.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 711768 ***