Bug 756863

Summary: [PATCH] Build with $RPM_LD_FLAGS, use xz compressed tarball
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta>
Component: python3Assignee: Dave Malcolm <dmalcolm>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: amcnabb, dmalcolm, tomspur
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Patch
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: python3-3.2.2-12.fc17 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-01 21:29:51 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Build with $RPM_LD_FLAGS, use xz compressed tarball none

Description Ville Skyttä 2011-11-24 22:08:19 UTC
Created attachment 536062 [details]
Build with $RPM_LD_FLAGS, use xz compressed tarball

Same as bug 756862 is for python 2.x, see that bug for more info.

Want me to push and build this for devel?

Comment 1 Dave Malcolm 2011-11-29 17:41:47 UTC
The bz2 -> xz change looks sane, go for it.

I'm wondering what the implication of the change from $LD_FLAGS to $RPM_LD_FLAGS is (if any).  Is this just a minor stylistic cleanup, or does it have an impact?

Comment 2 Dave Malcolm 2011-11-29 17:48:21 UTC
Note to self: bug 728974 added $RPM_LD_FLAGS; see:
  https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/563
for discussion of what it does

Comment 3 Ville Skyttä 2012-01-04 20:50:24 UTC
I took the liberty to push and build this for rawhide so as many packages as possible get the benefits as part of the ongoing gcc 4.7.0 mass rebuild.

However, the build failed, but I *guess* the failure was not related to this build because the previous build had failed as well (hard to tell because apparently the build logs are no longer available).  Leaving open until a version with this is actually in the repos.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=281119