Bug 814916
| Summary: | Review Request: sratom - a C library for serializing LV2 plugins | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Brendan Jones <brendan.jones.it> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | mattias.ellert, notting, oget.fedora, package-review |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | mattias.ellert:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-05-28 01:22:13 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 814542 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 805236, 797418, 814924 | ||
|
Description
Brendan Jones
2012-04-21 10:07:24 UTC
Build requirements exist in rawhide only for the moment Hi, could you clarify why this blocks qtractor? I see that the new lilv requires sratom, but I don't think qtractor requires the new lilv specifically. That's right - not specifically, I just wanted to hold up the qtractor review against the new LV2 (lv2/lilv/suil) updates. Up until now qtractor is the only package that is using suil/lilv. I made a full review on this, but I see that Mattias is already assigned to the bug. I'll post my findings anyways: ! rpmlint says: sratom.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US serialisation -> serialization, sensationalist, sensationalism sratom.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US serialise -> serialize, serial, aerialist sratom.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) serialising -> serializing, serialization There was a requirement that says the spec file must be written in American English, so I guess we should use serializ* * Need to add BuildRequires: serd-devel >= 0.14.0 Other than the above, the package is good to go. Fedora Review sratom 2012-04-22 $ rpmlint sratom*.rpm sratom.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) serialising -> serializing, serialization sratom.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US serialising -> serializing, serialization sratom.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US serialisation -> serialization, sensationalist, sensationalism sratom.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US serialise -> serialize, serial, aerialist sratom.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) serialising -> serializing, serialization sratom.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US serialising -> serializing, serialization sratom.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US serialisation -> serialization, sensationalist, sensationalism sratom.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US serialise -> serialize, serial, aerialist sratom-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US serialising -> serializing, serialization sratom-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US serialisation -> serialization, sensationalist, sensationalism sratom-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US serialise -> serialize, serial, aerialist 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings. Clean except for American English spelling in Summary and Description. + Package name according to guidelines + Specfile named after package + Package license (MIT) Fedora approved + Package license reflects license as stated in the sources + License file (COPYING) included as %doc - Specfile uses British spelling in summary and description This should be changed to American spelling according to guidelines See also the rpmlint report above + Specfile is readable + Source matches upstream $ md5sum sratom-0.2.0.tar.bz2 srpm/sratom-0.2.0.tar.bz2 c03cf2849186818610ffe889be4f5b55 sratom-0.2.0.tar.bz2 c03cf2849186818610ffe889be4f5b55 srpm/sratom-0.2.0.tar.bz2 - Package fail to build due to missing BuildRequires: python ./waf configure -v --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib64 --mandir=/usr/share/man --datadir=/usr/share --docdir=/usr/share/doc/sratom-devel-0.2.0 --test --docs /usr/bin/env: python: No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.3g1rbM (%build) [ Also my rebuild of the lv2 package on which this package depends failed with the same error ] + No locales + Scriptlets call ldconfig + No bundled libraries + Package owns directories it creates + No duplicates in %files + File permissions are sane + Specfile uses macros consistently + Contains code + Documentation is in -devel, though can be considered small + %doc not runtime essential + No static libraries + Headers and develoment library symlinks in -devel + -devel requires main with fully qualified version + No .la files + Package does not own ohters' libraries + Filenames valid UTF8 Summary: Fix American spelling and add missing BR on python SPEC: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/lv2/sratom.spec SRPM: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/lv2/sratom-0.2.0-2.fc16.src.rpm I've addressed the issues you picked up. Apologies for the missing BR. I've discovered a bug in the build tests for i686, and this will currently fail in mock. Seems to be OK for x86_64. I'll work through this with upstream and get it patched. Package approved. Thanks for taking this review New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: sratom Short Description: A C library for serializing LV2 atoms Owners: bsjones Branches: f16 f17 InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). sratom-0.2.0-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sratom-0.2.0-3.fc17 sratom-0.2.0-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. sratom-0.2.0-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. |