Bug 816057

Summary: [as7] Describe jndi-name + connector handling for HornetQ children
Product: [Other] RHQ Project Reporter: Heiko W. Rupp <hrupp>
Component: DocumentationAssignee: Deon Ballard <dlackey>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Mike Foley <mfoley>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4.3CC: hrupp, jsanda, mfoley
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: JON 3.1.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-02-24 17:40:52 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 707223    

Description Heiko W. Rupp 2012-04-25 07:28:57 UTC
HornetQ children JMS Queue, JMS Topic, Connection Factory) all have a list box to pass jndi names.
Due to Bug 815305 , the UI can not enforce that at least 1 jndi name is given, so that the user can
actually pass 0 entries without being warned. 
This condition is caught after submit and the create resource request will fail.
Same applies to configuration update



For connection factories, there is a connector element with two properties
- name   -- required
- backup  -- optional

The name is required. For whatever reasons, the UI can not enforce that this is needed on child resource creation. The presence of the name is enforced at plugin level. If no name is given creation will fail with an appropriate error message.
For configuration updates, this is no issue.

Comment 1 Heiko W. Rupp 2012-04-25 12:04:20 UTC
See also 816169 wrt connection factories

Comment 2 Heiko W. Rupp 2012-05-02 12:24:46 UTC
This has now changed slightly for connection-factories:

"backup" for the connector is no longer shown in the UI.
As the UI can not enforce that exactly one of connector and discovery-group-name are present, the plugin enforces this and reports appropriate errors.

Comment 3 Deon Ballard 2012-09-12 13:40:18 UTC
I added this to the release notes here (fourth in the list):
https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/en-US/JBoss_Operations_Network/3.1/html/3.1_Release_Notes/Known-Issues-with-this-release.html#known-issues-eap6

Since that issue is going to be fixed quickly, I didn't add it to the EAP 6 config documentation.

Comment 4 Armine Hovsepyan 2012-09-12 16:42:46 UTC
as talked to Deon, marking this back to on_dev to add info into regular docs.