Bug 831645
Summary: | Audrey Agent Fails to Access RHEVm User Data | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] CloudForms Cloud Engine | Reporter: | scollier | |
Component: | aeolus-audrey-agent | Assignee: | Joe Vlcek <jvlcek> | |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Rehana <aeolus-qa-list> | |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | unspecified | |||
Version: | 1.0.0 | CC: | cpelland, dajohnso, dgao, dmacpher, jprovazn, jrd, jvlcek, scollier, sreichar | |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Reopened, ZStream | |
Target Release: | --- | |||
Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
OS: | Unspecified | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||
Doc Text: |
Attempts to send user data to Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization instances sometimes failed. This bug fix adds an exponential retry mechanism. Cloud Engine retries failed attempts at sending user data with an exponential wait time after each retry.
|
Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 833590 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-12-04 15:10:45 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | ||||
Bug Blocks: | 833590 |
Description
scollier
2012-06-13 13:59:40 UTC
I upgraded the RHEV environment to 3.0.3 today. I just received the error again when launching to the RHEV environment: # cat /var/log/audrey.log 2012-06-14 02:21:47,611 - ERROR : audrey:93 Failed accessing RHEVm user data. This bug is caused by: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831577 which is introduced by applying a bad patch that fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796528. Closing this bug because it's not an audrey agent issue. I don't think this is caused by 831577 because: 1) a patch for 831577 was pushed only to 1.0.1 branch (fix of this regression - 796528 - is already in 1.0.1 too), but AFAIK Scott used 1.0.0 2) the problem occurs in 10%-20%, the regression introduced by 831577 caused failure in 100% Re-opening this bug - a problem is somewhere else. I have a patch in the works. Testing has been successful. commit d66ec3793fab6ce58f48369289b03f378903a606 The fix for this bug has been pushed and confirmed by QA. Why is it still open? Closing as this is no longer reproducible. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-1516.html |