Bug 831984

Summary: libvirt builds against libudev-devel, which is obsolete
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Michal Schmidt <mschmidt>
Component: libvirtAssignee: Libvirt Maintainers <libvirt-maint>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: berrange, clalancette, crobinso, dougsland, itamar, jforbes, jyang, laine, libvirt-maint, veillard, virt-maint
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: libvirt-0.9.13-1.fc18 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-07-02 18:45:18 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 831971    

Description Michal Schmidt 2012-06-14 08:45:51 UTC 
libvirt-0.9.12-1.fc18.src.rpm

libvirt.spec has:
  BuildRequires: libudev-devel >= 145

libudev-devel is going away. Please use systemd-devel. For details see:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-June/168227.html
Comment 1 Daniel Berrangé 2012-06-14 09:45:13 UTC 
Already fixed upstream, and will be in rawhide after next release of libvirt

commit dd7bc51bc45051b708c1b47b80d1e8402fcbcc5a
Author: Cole Robinson <crobinso>
Date:   Wed Jun 6 14:03:47 2012 -0400

    spec: Build against systemd for udev
    
    They have now merged. Fedora details here:
    
    https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-June/168227.html
Comment 2 Michal Schmidt 2012-07-02 08:24:57 UTC 
When can we expect the next release to arrive?

It is strange to have fixes for packaging issues blocked on waiting for an upstream release. Why cannot this be fixed in the Fedora spec file right now?
Comment 3 Cole Robinson 2012-07-02 14:29:30 UTC 
Because libvirt typically cuts a new release every month which seemed like a reasonable time frame. (and in fact a new release was made today)
Comment 4 Michal Schmidt 2012-07-02 18:45:18 UTC 
Great, thanks!