Bug 844504

Summary:	FTBFS in Rawhide with gphoto 2.5.0
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Adam Williamson <awilliam>
Component:	gvfs	Assignee:	Tomáš Bžatek <tbzatek>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	urgent	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	alexl, bnocera, robatino, tbzatek, tsmetana
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	AcceptedBlocker
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-08-10 17:57:21 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	752654

Description Adam Williamson 2012-07-30 23:19:43 UTC

gvfs has failed to build ever since Rawhide bumped to gphoto2 2.5.0. Reported upstream at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680871 , but duplicating downstream as this is a potential F18 Alpha blocker - it'll block compose of the F18 Alpha images unless we drop shotwell from the default packages, because the failure to rebuild gvfs makes shotwell un-installable in Rawhide at present:

Error creating Live CD : Failed to build transaction : shotwell-0.12.3-1.fc18.x86_64 requires libgphoto2.so.2()(64bit)
gvfs-gphoto2-1.13.2-1.fc18.x86_64 requires libgphoto2_port.so.0()(64bit)
gvfs-gphoto2-1.13.2-1.fc18.x86_64 requires libgphoto2.so.2()(64bit)
shotwell-0.12.3-1.fc18.x86_64 requires libgphoto2_port.so.0()(64bit)

Comment 1 Adam Williamson 2012-07-30 23:46:49 UTC

Actually, I think I mis-diagnosed that - shotwell doesn't depend on gvfs-gphoto2, they're just coincidentally both broken in the same way (by the gphoto2 API change). the shotwell issue should be a separate bug. The gvfs breakage is still important, of course.

Comment 2 Adam Williamson 2012-08-03 23:49:48 UTC

Discussed at the blocker bug review meeting of 2012-08-03: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2012-08-03/f18-alpha-blocker-review-1.2012-08-03-17.01.log.html .

Accepted as a blocker as it violates criterion "There must be no file conflicts (cases where the files in some packages conflict but the packages have explicit Conflicts: tags are acceptable) or unresolved package dependencies during a media-based (DVD) install" (unresolved deps), and would also break live image compose entirely.

Our options here, in descending order of desirability but probably ascending order of ease, are:

1) Patch the code to build against 2.5.0
2) Ship a gphoto2-compat package
3) Drop gvfs-gphoto2 from spins and the DVD until 1) or 2) is done

Comment 3 Adam Williamson 2012-08-07 21:17:56 UTC

Point 3) should obviously read 'Drop shotwell from spins...'.

Comment 4 Adam Williamson 2012-08-10 17:57:21 UTC

actually, it shouldn't. This is the bug for gvfs. jnovy actually fixed gvfs, but then closed 844510 - which is the bug for shotwell - instead of this bug.

So, I'm closing this bug - see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844510#c5 . I have re-opened 844510, for shotwell.