Bug 844504 - FTBFS in Rawhide with gphoto 2.5.0
Summary: FTBFS in Rawhide with gphoto 2.5.0
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gvfs
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tomáš Bžatek
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Whiteboard: AcceptedBlocker
Depends On:
Blocks: F18Alpha, F18AlphaBlocker
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2012-07-30 23:19 UTC by Adam Williamson
Modified: 2015-03-03 23:05 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2012-08-10 17:57:21 UTC
Type: Bug

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Adam Williamson 2012-07-30 23:19:43 UTC
gvfs has failed to build ever since Rawhide bumped to gphoto2 2.5.0. Reported upstream at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680871 , but duplicating downstream as this is a potential F18 Alpha blocker - it'll block compose of the F18 Alpha images unless we drop shotwell from the default packages, because the failure to rebuild gvfs makes shotwell un-installable in Rawhide at present:

Error creating Live CD : Failed to build transaction : shotwell-0.12.3-1.fc18.x86_64 requires libgphoto2.so.2()(64bit)
gvfs-gphoto2-1.13.2-1.fc18.x86_64 requires libgphoto2_port.so.0()(64bit)
gvfs-gphoto2-1.13.2-1.fc18.x86_64 requires libgphoto2.so.2()(64bit)
shotwell-0.12.3-1.fc18.x86_64 requires libgphoto2_port.so.0()(64bit)

Comment 1 Adam Williamson 2012-07-30 23:46:49 UTC
Actually, I think I mis-diagnosed that - shotwell doesn't depend on gvfs-gphoto2, they're just coincidentally both broken in the same way (by the gphoto2 API change). the shotwell issue should be a separate bug. The gvfs breakage is still important, of course.

Comment 2 Adam Williamson 2012-08-03 23:49:48 UTC
Discussed at the blocker bug review meeting of 2012-08-03: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2012-08-03/f18-alpha-blocker-review-1.2012-08-03-17.01.log.html .

Accepted as a blocker as it violates criterion "There must be no file conflicts (cases where the files in some packages conflict but the packages have explicit Conflicts: tags are acceptable) or unresolved package dependencies during a media-based (DVD) install" (unresolved deps), and would also break live image compose entirely.

Our options here, in descending order of desirability but probably ascending order of ease, are:

1) Patch the code to build against 2.5.0
2) Ship a gphoto2-compat package
3) Drop gvfs-gphoto2 from spins and the DVD until 1) or 2) is done

Comment 3 Adam Williamson 2012-08-07 21:17:56 UTC
Point 3) should obviously read 'Drop shotwell from spins...'.

Comment 4 Adam Williamson 2012-08-10 17:57:21 UTC
actually, it shouldn't. This is the bug for gvfs. jnovy actually fixed gvfs, but then closed 844510 - which is the bug for shotwell - instead of this bug.

So, I'm closing this bug - see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844510#c5 . I have re-opened 844510, for shotwell.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.