Bug 852819

Summary: Possibility of GlusterFS port clashes with reserved ports
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage Reporter: Vidya Sakar <vinaraya>
Component: glusterfsAssignee: Amar Tumballi <amarts>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Sudhir D <sdharane>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 2.0CC: amarts, botsch, gluster-bugs, joe, rfortier, rhs-bugs, rodrigo, sac, vbellur, vijay, vraman
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: GLUSTER-1257 Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-10-22 02:38:55 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 762989    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Vidya Sakar 2012-08-29 16:40:44 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #762989 +++

If the number of servers increase then there is a chance of GlusterFS port clashing with reserved ports.

For example if the servers increase more than 28 a pop3 over ssl daemon,
which uses 995 port, cannot start after GlusterFS client.

--- Additional comment from amarts on 2011-04-25 05:33:21 EDT ---

Please update the status of this bug as its been more than 6months since its filed (bug id < 2000)

Please resolve it with proper resolution if its not valid anymore. If its still valid and not critical, move it to 'enhancement' severity.

--- Additional comment from amarts on 2011-09-27 01:50:11 EDT ---

Planing to keep 3.4.x branch as "internal enhancements" release without any features. So moving these bugs to 3.4.0 target milestone.

--- Additional comment from sac on 2011-11-21 10:22:21 EST ---

Don't know if I can close this. Reported by Keisuke Takahashi... have to test this though.

--- Additional comment from amarts on 2012-03-25 05:11:14 EDT ---

*** Bug 806504 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

--- Additional comment from amarts on 2012-03-25 05:12:28 EDT ---

*** Bug 765228 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

--- Additional comment from rodrigo on 2012-06-04 11:33:04 EDT ---

Paraphasing David Coulson at Gluster Users mailing list:

Why does not use ports within the /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range?

--- Additional comment from botsch.edu on 2012-07-11 15:44:50 EDT ---

With two servers, glusterfs (v3.3) started up listening on port 993, which kept dovecot from starting. Not good. Please fix.

Comment 2 Amar Tumballi 2012-10-11 18:50:44 UTC
Need some better security measures before fixing this behavior. As of now, port < 1024 is the only main secure way of telling 'root' is mounting the client.

Comment 3 Amar Tumballi 2012-10-22 02:38:55 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 868715 ***