Bug 865459

Summary:

Cannot add a User to tomcat's UserDatabase

Product:

[JBoss] JBoss Enterprise Web Server 2

Reporter:

Jan Martiska <jmartisk>

Component:

JON Plugin

Assignee:

Jean-frederic Clere <jclere>

Status:

CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE

QA Contact:

Mike Foley <mfoley>

Severity:

high

Docs Contact:

Priority:

high

Version:

unspecified

CC:

ccrouch, jclere, jdoyle, lfuka, majoshi, mfoley, mhasko, mhusnain, myarboro

Target Milestone:

---

Target Release:

2.0.1

Hardware:

Unspecified

OS:

Unspecified

Whiteboard:

Fixed In Version:

Doc Type:

Bug Fix

Doc Text:

Due to missing parameters in the public class, adding a user to Tomcat's <classname>UserDatabase</classname> using the JBoss Operations Network (JON) interface in JBoss Enterprise Web Server displays an error in agent's log indicating that the MBean parameters are invalid. A fix is applied to add the missing parameters. As a result, adding users to Tomcat's <classname>UserDatabase</classname> using JBoss Operations Network (JON) works as expected in JBoss Operations Network (JON).

Story Points:

---

Clone Of:

Environment:

Last Closed:

2014-01-03 12:58:37 UTC

Type:

Bug

Regression:

---

Mount Type:

---

Documentation:

---

CRM:

Verified Versions:

Category:

---

oVirt Team:

---

RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:

Cloudforms Team:

---

Target Upstream Version:

Embargoed:

Bug Depends On:

Bug Blocks:

956987, 956990

Attachments:

Description	Flags
Avoid operation error	none

Description Jan Martiska 2012-10-11 13:38:23 UTC

Tomcat7 version: EWS 2.0.0.CR1

When I try to add a User through JON's interface, I get this error in agent's log:

2012-10-11 09:35:03,828 DEBUG [ResourceFactory.executor-1] (rhq.core.pc.inventory.CreateResourceRunner)- Throwable was found in creation report for request [10082].
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Name [roles] specified for parameter of operation [createUser] on MBean [Users:type=UserDatabase,database=UserDatabase] is invalid. The MBean operation does not take a parameter by that name.
	at org.rhq.plugins.jmx.MBeanResourceComponent.invokeOperation(MBeanResourceComponent.java:576)
	at org.rhq.plugins.jmx.MBeanResourceComponent.invokeOperation(MBeanResourceComponent.java:524)
	at org.jboss.on.plugins.tomcat.TomcatUserDatabaseComponent.createResource(TomcatUserDatabaseComponent.java:68)
	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
	at org.rhq.core.pc.inventory.ResourceContainer$ComponentInvocationThread.call(ResourceContainer.java:634)
	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)
	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)

Comment 1 mark yarborough 2012-11-12 20:22:33 UTC

This bug needs a corresponding bug in Jira or Bz (as appropriate) owned by the plugin team. Mark Yarborough work with John Doyle to define EWS owner.

Comment 2 Remy Maucherat 2012-11-29 18:11:54 UTC

Created attachment 654435 [details]
Avoid operation error

Avoid the error due to the missing parameters on the operation. Any roles or groups must be added later.

Comment 3 Michal Haško 2013-01-08 09:03:54 UTC

This issue affects all tomcat{5,6,7} versions.

Comment 4 Michal Haško 2013-01-08 09:04:12 UTC

*** Bug 865403 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 Libor Fuka 2013-05-10 12:49:06 UTC

Verified with Tomcat plugin brew build [1] and EWS 2.0.1.ER1
[1] https://brewweb.devel.redhat.com//buildinfo?buildID=269954

Comment 8 Mandar Joshi 2013-05-14 06:33:42 UTC

Added DocText.

@Wei Nan Li, can you please review the Doc Text content?

Comment 9 Mandar Joshi 2013-05-14 06:47:40 UTC

oops..

@Jean-Frederic Clere,  can you please review the Doc Text content?

Comment 10 Jean-frederic Clere 2013-05-14 09:04:26 UTC

See BZ 688358 they are duplicated.

Comment 11 Jean-frederic Clere 2013-06-14 08:50:29 UTC

That is nice to have the details for the fix in the release notices but are you sure the customers need that.
See BZ 865460

Comment 12 Misha H. Ali 2013-06-14 09:17:12 UTC

Jean-Frederic, ideally all the release notes should have this much detail where possible. Unfortunately this is not possible sometimes without SME additions. For consistency, I have reduced the detail to match other similar bugs.