Bug 865459 - Cannot add a User to tomcat's UserDatabase
Summary: Cannot add a User to tomcat's UserDatabase
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Enterprise Web Server 2
Classification: JBoss
Component: JON Plugin
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 2.0.1
Assignee: Jean-frederic Clere
QA Contact: Mike Foley
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 865403 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 956987 956990
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-10-11 13:38 UTC by Jan Martiska
Modified: 2014-08-08 04:23 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Due to missing parameters in the public class, adding a user to Tomcat's <classname>UserDatabase</classname> using the JBoss Operations Network (JON) interface in JBoss Enterprise Web Server displays an error in agent's log indicating that the MBean parameters are invalid. A fix is applied to add the missing parameters. As a result, adding users to Tomcat's <classname>UserDatabase</classname> using JBoss Operations Network (JON) works as expected in JBoss Operations Network (JON).
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-01-03 12:58:37 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Avoid operation error (1.74 KB, patch)
2012-11-29 18:11 UTC, Remy Maucherat 		no flags Details | Diff
View All

Description Jan Martiska 2012-10-11 13:38:23 UTC 
Tomcat7 version: EWS 2.0.0.CR1

When I try to add a User through JON's interface, I get this error in agent's log:

2012-10-11 09:35:03,828 DEBUG [ResourceFactory.executor-1] (rhq.core.pc.inventory.CreateResourceRunner)- Throwable was found in creation report for request [10082].
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Name [roles] specified for parameter of operation [createUser] on MBean [Users:type=UserDatabase,database=UserDatabase] is invalid. The MBean operation does not take a parameter by that name.
	at org.rhq.plugins.jmx.MBeanResourceComponent.invokeOperation(MBeanResourceComponent.java:576)
	at org.rhq.plugins.jmx.MBeanResourceComponent.invokeOperation(MBeanResourceComponent.java:524)
	at org.jboss.on.plugins.tomcat.TomcatUserDatabaseComponent.createResource(TomcatUserDatabaseComponent.java:68)
	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
	at org.rhq.core.pc.inventory.ResourceContainer$ComponentInvocationThread.call(ResourceContainer.java:634)
	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)
	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
Comment 1 mark yarborough 2012-11-12 20:22:33 UTC 
This bug needs a corresponding bug in Jira or Bz (as appropriate) owned by the plugin team. Mark Yarborough work with John Doyle to define EWS owner.
Comment 2 Remy Maucherat 2012-11-29 18:11:54 UTC 
Created attachment 654435 [details]
Avoid operation error

Avoid the error due to the missing parameters on the operation. Any roles or groups must be added later.
Comment 3 Michal Haško 2013-01-08 09:03:54 UTC 
This issue affects all tomcat{5,6,7} versions.
Comment 4 Michal Haško 2013-01-08 09:04:12 UTC 
*** Bug 865403 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Libor Fuka 2013-05-10 12:49:06 UTC 
Verified with Tomcat plugin brew build [1] and EWS 2.0.1.ER1
[1] https://brewweb.devel.redhat.com//buildinfo?buildID=269954
Comment 8 Mandar Joshi 2013-05-14 06:33:42 UTC 
Added DocText.

@Wei Nan Li, can you please review the Doc Text content?
Comment 9 Mandar Joshi 2013-05-14 06:47:40 UTC 
oops..

@Jean-Frederic Clere,  can you please review the Doc Text content?
Comment 10 Jean-frederic Clere 2013-05-14 09:04:26 UTC 
See BZ 688358 they are duplicated.
Comment 11 Jean-frederic Clere 2013-06-14 08:50:29 UTC 
That is nice to have the details for the fix in the release notices but are you sure the customers need that.
See BZ 865460
Comment 12 Misha H. Ali 2013-06-14 09:17:12 UTC 
Jean-Frederic, ideally all the release notes should have this much detail where possible. Unfortunately this is not possible sometimes without SME additions. For consistency, I have reduced the detail to match other similar bugs.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.