Bug 891053

Summary: 3.1.z Error deleting VM disk
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Ayal Baron <abaron>
Component: vdsmAssignee: Yeela Kaplan <ykaplan>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Haim <hateya>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.3CC: abaron, bazulay, dron, dyasny, ewarszaw, hateya, iheim, ilvovsky, ipilcher, lpeer, mlipchuk, oourfali, Rhev-m-bugs, sgordon, sgrinber, tjelinek, yeylon, ykaplan, ykaul
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: ZStream
Target Release: 6.3   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: storage
Fixed In Version: vdsm-4.9.6-44.3 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
A typographical mistake in the rmDCImgDir function of blockSD.py meant that when an OSError exception was encountered it was not logged correctly. The mistake has been corrected and the function now logs errors correctly.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 885489 Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-01-15 09:52:56 EST Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On: 885489, 891054    
Bug Blocks: 891052    

Comment 1 Ayal Baron 2013-01-01 07:50:57 EST
*** Bug 891054 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Haim 2013-01-06 07:22:18 EST
verified on vdsm4.9.6-44.3 installed on QE production environment.
managed to delete a VM (disk) where the image was missing, instead of exception I got valid error message of:

Thread-491::ERROR::2013-01-06 14:09:30,662::dispatcher::66::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run) {'status': {'message': "Image does not exist in domain: 'image=0def7577-eec8-48e0-
8100-1e492752fc47, domain=d5d0dfe6-c2b9-429e-96c2-c1cd247ac828'", 'code': 268}}
Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2013-01-15 09:52:56 EST
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0159.html