Bug 946885

Summary: gnucash-2.5.0 is available
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Upstream Release Monitoring <upstream-release-monitoring>
Component: gnucashAssignee: Bill Nottingham <notting>
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: notting, rvokal
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-04-04 14:15:20 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Upstream Release Monitoring 2013-03-31 19:02:48 UTC 
Latest upstream release: 2.5.0
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 2.4.11
URL: http://sourceforge.net/api/file/index/project-name/gnucash/mtime/desc/limit/100/rss

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2013-04-04 14:15:20 UTC 
Yeah, not putting the devel stream for 2.6 in Fedora until it's actually going to be released. (Likely ~F20).
Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2013-07-10 15:02:35 UTC 
*** Bug 982963 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2013-08-06 19:29:11 UTC 
*** Bug 991751 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 2013-09-10 16:10:47 UTC 
*** Bug 1006284 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Bill Nottingham 2013-10-08 20:58:41 UTC 
*** Bug 1016879 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Bill Nottingham 2013-11-04 16:33:08 UTC 
*** Bug 1026061 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Bill Nottingham 2013-11-18 15:15:28 UTC 
*** Bug 1031401 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Bill Nottingham 2013-12-02 17:54:32 UTC 
*** Bug 1036553 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Bill Nottingham 2013-12-18 17:17:28 UTC 
*** Bug 1044399 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***