Bug 970981

Summary: RFE: Need to rebase python-urwid on latest upstream
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Mike Burns <mburns>
Component: python-urwidAssignee: Andy Grover <agrover>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Branislav Blaškovič <bblaskov>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 6.5CC: azelinka, bblaskov, bgoncalv, borgan, ccui, gouyang, leiwang, lnovich, mburns, mjenner, sradvan, xiaoli, ycui
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: FutureFeature, Rebase
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-21 05:41:15 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 883504, 911398, 911400, 927543    

Description Mike Burns 2013-06-05 11:41:01 UTC 
Description of problem:
ovirt-node/RHEV-H has a dependency on python-urwid for it's new UI (our headline feature in 6.5).  It turns out that there are a number of incompatibilities between the version upstream (1.1.1-1) and the version in EL6 (0.9.9-4).  

We would like to rebase 6.5 to the newer version in Fedora.
Comment 2 Mike Burns 2013-06-05 11:53:29 UTC 
Current dependency chain for python-urwid:

python-urwid-0.9.9.1-4.el6.x86_64 [cmd line]
 \_  1:python-configshell-1.1.fb4-1.el6.noarch [1: python-urwid = 0.9.9.1-4.el6]
 |   \_  fcoe-target-utils-2.0rc1.fb16-3.el6.noarch [1: python-configshell = 1:1.1.fb4-1.el6]
Comment 17 Bruno Goncalves 2013-09-06 08:08:05 UTC 
targetcli seems to work fine with:

rpm -q python-urwid
python-urwid-1.1.1-1.el6.x86_64

rpm -q fcoe-target-utils
fcoe-target-utils-2.0rc1.fb16-5.el6.noarch
Comment 23 Branislav Blaškovič 2013-10-31 06:00:27 UTC 
Thank you! So python-urwid is prepared now.
Comment 25 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-21 05:41:15 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1550.html