Bug 972446
Summary: | F2FS kernel module not built | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Rolf Fokkens <rolf> |
Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Kernel Maintainer List <kernel-maint> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 21 | CC: | axel.sommerfeldt, gansalmon, gmazyland, itamar, jan.public, jonathan, kernel-maint, madhu.chinakonda, marcosfrm, mariuszs, mszpak, rjones, sjenning |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | kernel-3.17.8-200.fc20 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-01-11 02:57:49 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Rolf Fokkens
2013-06-09 13:38:06 UTC
We don't plan on enabling this in the generic kernel. F2FS seems to have an outstanding performance in certain common workloads: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_314_ssdfs&num=1 I would also ask to enable the respective kernel module. Perhaps it could go into kernel-modules-extra now that we have that? Okay, you bunch of redhat morons really deserve negative PR as seen on http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTg3MDQ Its just amazing how some distro and company can be hostile to their users and especially enthusiasts willing to try new technologies here and there. Your bug handling is fucked. And even Ubuntu more sane these days - they supply F2FS by default. lnx.usr - Your tone and language are completely inappropriate. (In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #3) > Perhaps it could go into kernel-modules-extra now that we have that? If it is not possible include it in kernel-modules, then yes please. I plan on opening a new ticket after feedback from the Devel mailing list. I don't believe requiring uses to install kernel-modules-extra is the way to go on this. If it's good enough for Ubuntu (which is a distribution aimed at new linux users) it is certainly good enough for Fedora. *** Bug 1176538 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Dave says it works pretty well: http://youtu.be/DxZzSifuV4Q?t=21m32s Thanks to everyone that has contributed productive information so far. We'll take a look at this again in a couple of weeks. I've enabled this in Fedora git. It will be in the next build of the f20-rawhide kernels. kernel-3.17.8-300.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kernel-3.17.8-300.fc21 kernel-3.17.8-200.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kernel-3.17.8-200.fc20 Package kernel-3.17.8-200.fc20: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing kernel-3.17.8-200.fc20' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-0515/kernel-3.17.8-200.fc20 then log in and leave karma (feedback). kernel-3.17.8-300.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. kernel-3.17.8-200.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |