Bug 976551
| Summary: | No check for already enabled collections in scl enable <collection>+ <command> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Jan Kurik <jkurik> |
| Component: | scl-utils | Assignee: | Jan Zeleny <jzeleny> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Lukáš Zachar <lzachar> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 6.4 | CC: | abienven, drieden, jkurik, jzeleny, lzachar, pm-eus |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | ZStream |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | scl-utils-20120927-2.el6_4.6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
* Previously, when enabling collections, a check whether a collection was enabled was performed. However, independently of the result the collection was always enabled. Consequently, if a single collection had been stated multiple times in the command line, it would be enabled multiple times. In the case of some destructive enable scriptlets, this might have led to some undetermined behavior. This update runs the enable scriptlet only if the collection has not been enabled before, and attempts to enable a collection multiple times in one environment will be ignored.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-07-16 09:53:19 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 964058 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Jan Kurik
2013-06-20 18:57:55 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1065.html |