Bug 1003218 - environment-modules versions less than v3.2.10 are buggy
Summary: environment-modules versions less than v3.2.10 are buggy
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 976369
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: environment-modules
Version: 6.4
Hardware: All
OS: All
urgent
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jan Synacek
QA Contact: BaseOS QE Security Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-08-31 23:22 UTC by Fotis Georgatos
Modified: 2014-03-26 09:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-26 10:52:08 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 997946 0 unspecified CLOSED environment-modules versions less than v3.2.10 are buggy 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Description Fotis Georgatos 2013-08-31 23:22:31 UTC 
Description of problem:
environment-modules releases less than v3.2.10 are buggy. 
This is same exact case like (now resolved for epel5):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997946

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Solution same as:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11238/environment-modules-3.2.10-1.el5
Comment 1 Orion Poplawski 2013-08-31 23:37:54 UTC 
environment-modules is in RHEL6, not EPEL6.
Comment 2 Jan Synacek 2013-09-02 12:07:42 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 976369 ***
Comment 3 Fotis Georgatos 2013-11-25 17:27:31 UTC 
Please **open a support case via RedHat's Customer Portal** for your organization,
if you are impacted by this; this is what will escalate the priority.
(fi. Uni.Lu request is via https://access.redhat.com/support/cases/00987366/)
Comment 4 Fotis Georgatos 2013-11-26 10:09:56 UTC 
reopening this issue...
Comment 6 Jan Synacek 2013-11-26 10:52:08 UTC 
(In reply to Fotis Georgatos from comment #4)
> reopening this issue...

Why? I marked it as a duplicate for a reason... And you put it in MODIFIED, which is wrong.

Please, use bug #976369.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 976369 ***
Comment 7 Fotis Georgatos 2014-03-26 09:11:29 UTC 
after addressing #1076072, this issue should likely be considered as handled OK.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.