Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1005344

Summary: duplicate entries in volume property
Product: [Community] GlusterFS Reporter: purpleidea
Component: glusterdAssignee: Atin Mukherjee <amukherj>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: mainlineCC: amukherj, bugs, dblack, purpleidea, sarumuga, sasundar
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: glusterfs-4.1.3 (or later) Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1256268 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-08-29 03:36:59 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1056028, 1245168, 1256268    

Description purpleidea 2013-09-06 17:07:31 UTC
On 09/06/2013 07:07 PM, James wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-09-06 at 09:27 -0400, James wrote:
>> Hi Gluster,
>>
>> I figured that I would mention a weird finding. If you run a:
>>
>> gluster volume set help
>>
>> you'll get a useful list of properties to set. After closer inspection,
>> I noticed that:
>>
>> network.tcp-window-size
>>
>> appears twice. This doesn't really bother me if it's just a silly
>> cosmetic thing, but I figured I'd mention it in case there was some
>> mistakenly duplicated code somewhere.
>>
>> Maybe someone can forward it to the appropriate dev.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> James
>>
> Actually, I found another one:
>
> # Size of the read cache.
> performance.cache-size    # default: 32MB
>
> # Size of the read cache.
> performance.cache-size    # default: 128MB
>
> However they have different defaults. Maybe someone can figure out which
> witch is which.
>
> Cheers,
> James

I will suggest you to file a bug in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ for this.

Thanks,
Lala

Comment 1 Anand Avati 2015-04-02 04:41:48 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10110 (glusterd: remove duplicate entries from volume set help) posted (#1) for review on master by Atin Mukherjee (amukherj)

Comment 2 Anand Avati 2015-04-02 10:32:49 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10110 (glusterd: remove duplicate entries from volume set help) posted (#2) for review on master by Vijay Bellur (vbellur)

Comment 3 Anand Avati 2015-04-06 04:29:56 UTC
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/10110 committed in master by Kaushal M (kaushal) 
------
commit e1e41ae67816ad6f23d074632c9d3f198e15aba3
Author: Atin Mukherjee <amukherj>
Date:   Thu Apr 2 10:09:39 2015 +0530

    glusterd: remove duplicate entries from volume set help
    
    gluster volume set help was displaying redundant entries for
    performance.cache-size & network.tcp-window-size as the same key is used in
    different translators. Fix is to consider all the redundant ones as NO_DOC
    
    Change-Id: I7739d992f6fdbb24765caedbb05099d269110476
    BUG: 1005344
    Signed-off-by: Atin Mukherjee <amukherj>
    Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/10110
    Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com>
    Reviewed-by: Kaushal M <kaushal>

Comment 4 Atin Mukherjee 2015-04-10 11:47:55 UTC
Moving it back to Assigned state as the patch doesn't fix the problem.

Comment 5 Niels de Vos 2015-05-14 17:25:34 UTC
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.7.0, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-3.7.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.devel/10939
[2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.user

Comment 6 Niels de Vos 2015-05-14 17:35:26 UTC
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.7.0, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-3.7.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.devel/10939
[2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.user

Comment 7 Niels de Vos 2015-05-14 17:37:47 UTC
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.7.0, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-3.7.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.devel/10939
[2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.user

Comment 8 Niels de Vos 2015-05-14 17:42:17 UTC
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.7.0, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-3.7.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.devel/10939
[2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.user

Comment 9 Atin Mukherjee 2015-07-20 04:04:03 UTC
Re opening this bug as this bug was moved to closed by mistake.

Comment 10 Anand Avati 2015-07-23 10:08:44 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10262 (glusterd: Have unique volume options) posted (#6) for review on master by Atin Mukherjee (amukherj)

Comment 11 Anand Avati 2015-08-11 08:37:16 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10262 (glusterd: Have unique volume options) posted (#7) for review on master by Atin Mukherjee (amukherj)

Comment 12 Anand Avati 2015-08-20 04:39:46 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10262 (glusterd: Have unique volume options) posted (#8) for review on master by Atin Mukherjee (amukherj)

Comment 13 Anand Avati 2015-08-20 09:18:00 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10262 (glusterd: Have unique volume options) posted (#9) for review on master by Atin Mukherjee (amukherj)

Comment 14 Anand Avati 2015-08-20 11:40:00 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10262 (glusterd: Have unique volume options) posted (#10) for review on master by Atin Mukherjee (amukherj)

Comment 15 Anand Avati 2015-08-26 04:30:55 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10262 (glusterd: Have unique volume options) posted (#13) for review on master by Atin Mukherjee (amukherj)

Comment 16 Saravanakumar 2015-09-09 09:57:10 UTC
*** Bug 1238608 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 17 Mike McCune 2016-03-28 22:14:36 UTC
This bug was accidentally moved from POST to MODIFIED via an error in automation, please see mmccune with any questions

Comment 18 Amar Tumballi 2018-08-29 03:36:59 UTC
This update is done in bulk based on the state of the patch and the time since last activity. If the issue is still seen, please reopen the bug.