Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1238608

Summary: Repeating georep config options
Product: [Community] GlusterFS Reporter: Saravanakumar <sarumuga>
Component: geo-replicationAssignee: Saravanakumar <sarumuga>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact:
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: mainlineCC: amukherj, bugs, gluster-bugs
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-09-09 09:57:10 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Saravanakumar 2015-07-02 09:21:48 UTC
Description of problem:

gluster volume get <volname> all 
Displays geo-replication options twice

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Create a volume

Run the command, gluster volume get <volname> all 



Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create volume
2. gluster volume get <volname> all | grep geo-replication
3. You should notice georep options twice.

Actual results:
georep options repeated twice.

Expected results:
georep options should be displayed once.


Additional info:

Comment 1 Anand Avati 2015-07-02 09:23:08 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/11505 (geo-rep: Avoid repeating georep config options) posted (#2) for review on master by Saravanakumar Arumugam (sarumuga)

Comment 2 Anand Avati 2015-07-02 09:26:30 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/11505 (geo-rep: Avoid repeating georep config options) posted (#3) for review on master by Saravanakumar Arumugam (sarumuga)

Comment 3 Atin Mukherjee 2015-07-03 06:10:17 UTC
http://review.gluster.org/10262 has the fix for it. However this patch fixes the other duplication options as well. I would recommend you to take a look at it.

Comment 4 Saravanakumar 2015-09-09 09:57:10 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1005344 ***