Bug 1008461 - DTGov sample workflow is not valid
Summary: DTGov sample workflow is not valid
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1002003
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Fuse Service Works 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: DT Governance
Version: 6.0.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: 6.0.0
Assignee: Kurt T Stam
QA Contact: Jiri Sedlacek
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-09-16 12:02 UTC by Stefan Bunciak
Modified: 2015-08-02 23:44 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-10-03 01:00:58 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Eclipse Project 417320 0 None None None Never
Red Hat Bugzilla 1002003 0 unspecified CLOSED BPMN validation errors after starting DTGov workflow 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC
Red Hat Bugzilla 1008459 1 None None None 2021-01-20 06:05:38 UTC

Internal Links: 1002003 1008459

Description Stefan Bunciak 2013-09-16 12:02:40 UTC
Description of problem:

I'm not sure how the BPMN2 SimpleReleaseProcess process is created (either via Eclipse BPMN2 modeler or some other way) but it contains validation error:

Input Output Specification has no Output Set	overlord.demo.SimpleReleaseProcess.bpmn	/dtgov-workflows/SRAMPPackage	line 1078	jBPM Process Problem

I've filed a new issue for the Eclipse BPMN2 modeler so that it will not produce this kind of error when creating a new process: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=417320

I also filed a BZ for the documentation: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008459

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

dtgov-workflows-1.0.1.Final-redhat2

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Kurt T Stam 2013-10-03 01:00:58 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1002003 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.