Description of problem: Probably because portal.war was removed, I am not able to update package content via UI Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): JON 3.2.0.ER2 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. have some deployment on AS7 2. go to it's content and try to upload new version Actual results: once you select "Upload package" and dialog for uploading new file pops up, then you upload a file, content of that dialog completely screws up. It shouws css styles or JSP, there is no way to finish the dialog Expected results: you're able to upload file and continue, then package content get's updated Additional info:
I had a lot of troubles with this issue, but at the end it worked well in FF, but was failing in Chrome. Because we don't support Chrome and this will be rewritten to GWT in the future versions, I wouldn't consider it as a bug / JON32 blocker. Could you please try to reproduce it in IE9? I think, I was trying it and it worked, but I am not sure.
On IE9, I was able to select a file and upload it, but when I clicked the final "UPload package" I got an error The page reauested cannot be displayed /portal/rhq/resource/content/confirm-create-plain.xhtml
Created attachment 814953 [details] screenshot IE9
branch: release/jon3.2.x link: http://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/rhq/rhq.git/commit/?id=5e686f214 time: 2013-10-29 18:32:44 +0100 commit: 5e686f21429e224669de50be81c89849ea5d452a author: Jirka Kremser - jkremser message: [BZ 1015436] - [portal.war] unable to update package content via UI - JSF navigation rules magic (cherry picked from commit 1ff05771a922f171f18be00cb634f092aa021c3c) branch: release/jon3.2.x link: http://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/rhq/rhq.git/commit/?id=69a56fde7 time: 2013-10-29 18:33:14 +0100 commit: 69a56fde70b7212a372bf73063d73f4cbfeeea8a author: Jirka Kremser - jkremser message: [BZ 1015436] - typo ("/" was missing) (cherry picked from commit 4b256be9c4e29e340e720db5bff8a35c9680cce2)
Moving to ON_QA for test with new brew build.
verified on ER5 on IE9
*** Bug 1020884 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***