Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 102499 - sox RPM does not install soxmix
sox RPM does not install soxmix
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: sox (Show other bugs)
9
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Bill Nottingham
:
: 108028 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2003-08-15 18:58 EDT by Jared Smith
Modified: 2014-03-16 22:38 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: 12.17.4-1
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-10-07 23:14:40 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Patch to the spec file to correct this bug (937 bytes, text/plain)
2003-08-15 19:17 EDT, Jared Smith
no flags Details


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2004:409 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: sox security update 2004-07-29 00:00:00 EDT

  None (edit)
Description Jared Smith 2003-08-15 18:58:13 EDT
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686) Gecko/20030530 Galeon/1.3.5

Description of problem:
The following lines in the .spec file for the sox RPM excludes soxmix from being
installed:

# remove unpackaged files from the buildroot
rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/soxmix

Instead, why not just add soxmix to %files?

Is there some reason why soxmix isn't part of the RPM?  


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
12.17-3

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install the sox RPM
2. run "rpm -ql sox"
    

Actual Results:  /usr/bin/soxmix is not listed

Expected Results:  /usr/bin/soxmix should be listed

Additional info:

Other distributions (such as Mandrake, PLD, etc.) include soxmix as part of
their sox RPM.  If it's part of the sox source tarball, why exclude it from the RPM?

(I also checked the RPM in rawhide... it's suffers from the same problem)
Comment 1 Jared Smith 2003-08-15 19:17:55 EDT
Created attachment 93675 [details]
Patch to the spec file to correct this bug

This is a patch to the sox.spec file to correct the problem.
Comment 2 Jared Smith 2003-10-02 14:53:22 EDT
This still hasn't changed as of Fedora Core Test (severn 2) or RawHide as of
10/02/2003.  

Bill Nottingham mentioned in the mailing list the other day that not including
soxmix was an accident... So let's get it fixed!

Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2003-10-07 23:14:40 EDT
fixed in 12.17.4-1.
Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 2003-10-26 15:25:01 EST
*** Bug 108028 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Mark J. Cox 2004-07-29 15:10:35 EDT
An errata has been issued which should help the problem 
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being 
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, 
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report 
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-409.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.