Bug 1027535 - [RFE] Support Provisioning of Highly Available Setup via Puppet [NEEDINFO]
Summary: [RFE] Support Provisioning of Highly Available Setup via Puppet
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 998597
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openstack-foreman-installer
Version: 4.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.0
Assignee: Jason Guiditta
QA Contact: Ami Jeain
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-11-07 03:27 UTC by james labocki
Modified: 2016-04-26 20:13 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-12-09 15:54:20 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
jguiditt: needinfo? (jlabocki)
jguiditt: needinfo? (jlabocki)


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description james labocki 2013-11-07 03:27:12 UTC
This is a RFE to Support Provisioning of Red Hat Enterprise Linux OpenStack Platform in a Highly Available configuration via puppet.

Comment 2 Mike Orazi 2013-11-13 19:53:02 UTC
Jay,

Can you update this BZ with the current state of things.  

It is probably worth a discussion with jlabocki/sreichar/fabione to talk about current state and the appropriate way to handle this bug and potential create more tracking issues for the ongoing work.

Comment 3 Jason Guiditta 2013-11-14 19:37:59 UTC
We currenlty have a Load Balancer host group, an HA Mysql host group (uses pacemaker cluster).  This gives us for HA a load balanced controller (all api services) and active/passive mysql.  Not sure what next steps are afa this RFE, or if that is enough for an initial set to support?

Comment 4 Mike Orazi 2013-11-25 14:33:11 UTC
Jay,

I think we probably should provide the names of the host groups + a quick how-to so docs has something to chew on.

And to be clear -- at this point, I think we ought to have this ON_QA since the code exists as of the beta and we'd like QE to be actively working against it.  We are going to have to make a go/no-go decision based on the gaps that Fabbio is looking to identify but that shouldn't stop folks from checking out what exists.

Comment 5 Jason Guiditta 2013-11-25 16:11:30 UTC
This dies exist in beta/rpm/rdo, and seems to me to be asking for the same thing as BZ #998597 [1].  James, can you take a look at that and tell me if you see any difference between that and what you are requesting here?  If not, I'd like to close that as a duplicate.


[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998597

Comment 6 Perry Myers 2013-12-09 15:54:20 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 998597 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.