Bug 1027535
| Summary: | [RFE] Support Provisioning of Highly Available Setup via Puppet | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | james labocki <jlabocki> |
| Component: | openstack-foreman-installer | Assignee: | Jason Guiditta <jguiditt> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Ami Jeain <ajeain> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 4.0 | CC: | cwolfe, hateya, jlabocki, morazi, rhos-maint, slong, yeylon |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
| Target Release: | 4.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-12-09 15:54:20 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
james labocki
2013-11-07 03:27:12 UTC
Jay, Can you update this BZ with the current state of things. It is probably worth a discussion with jlabocki/sreichar/fabione to talk about current state and the appropriate way to handle this bug and potential create more tracking issues for the ongoing work. We currenlty have a Load Balancer host group, an HA Mysql host group (uses pacemaker cluster). This gives us for HA a load balanced controller (all api services) and active/passive mysql. Not sure what next steps are afa this RFE, or if that is enough for an initial set to support? Jay, I think we probably should provide the names of the host groups + a quick how-to so docs has something to chew on. And to be clear -- at this point, I think we ought to have this ON_QA since the code exists as of the beta and we'd like QE to be actively working against it. We are going to have to make a go/no-go decision based on the gaps that Fabbio is looking to identify but that shouldn't stop folks from checking out what exists. This dies exist in beta/rpm/rdo, and seems to me to be asking for the same thing as BZ #998597 [1]. James, can you take a look at that and tell me if you see any difference between that and what you are requesting here? If not, I'd like to close that as a duplicate. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998597 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 998597 *** The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days |