Bug 1035456 - Removing a DataObject corrupts the definition.
Summary: Removing a DataObject corrupts the definition.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED EOL
Alias: None
Product: JBoss BPMS Platform 6
Classification: Retired
Component: jBPM Designer
Version: 6.0.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 6.2.0
Assignee: Tihomir Surdilovic
QA Contact: Kirill Gaevskii
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-11-27 20:00 UTC by Marek Baluch
Modified: 2020-03-27 19:09 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-03-27 19:09:04 UTC
Type: Feature Request
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
screenshot (129.55 KB, image/png)
2013-11-27 20:00 UTC, Marek Baluch
no flags Details
screencast (1.26 MB, video/mp4)
2013-11-27 20:01 UTC, Marek Baluch
no flags Details

Description Marek Baluch 2013-11-27 20:00:07 UTC
Description of problem:
When I add a DataObject to a process and let the designer generate the assignments and datasets (by saving the process and opening it) then this DataObject cannot be removed. If I remove it and save the process then any subsequent attempt to open the file will fail.

How to reproduce:
1) create a process
2) add start->task->end
3) add a DataObject and connect it to the task
4) save, close and open the process
5) remove the DataObject
6) save, close and attempt to open

Actual result:
Error message is shown (attached screenshot)

Expected result:
The process will open

Additional info:
See attached screencast

Comment 1 Marek Baluch 2013-11-27 20:00:41 UTC
Created attachment 829907 [details]
screenshot

Comment 2 Marek Baluch 2013-11-27 20:01:27 UTC
Created attachment 829908 [details]
screencast

Comment 3 Kris Verlaenen 2013-12-12 23:43:30 UTC
This will be addressed in a later release, for now DataObject will be disabled:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1042524

Comment 4 Kris Verlaenen 2014-02-11 02:04:50 UTC
Re-enabling data object post 6.0.1.GA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1042524

Comment 5 Kirill Gaevskii 2015-12-08 11:03:18 UTC
Verified for 6.2.GA


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.