Bug 1048327 - Missing bn_BD locale folder
Summary: Missing bn_BD locale folder
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: filesystem
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ondrej Vasik
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-01-03 18:01 UTC by Mario Blättermann
Modified: 2014-01-10 09:40 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-01-10 09:40:31 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mario Blättermann 2014-01-03 18:01:59 UTC
A certain folder is missing from the "filesystem" package. It usually contains all folders for the *.mo files, but one is missing:

/usr/share/locale/bn_BD/LC_MESSAGES/

However, that folder exists on my system anyway. But the parent folders stay unowned, and this is not allowed by the packaginmg guidelines. At least four packages install files there without ownership of the parent folder:

policycoreutils-2.2.2-3.fc20.x86_64
system-config-date-1.10.6-1.fc20.noarch
system-config-services-0.111.1-1.fc20.noarch
system-config-users-1.3.5-1.fc20.noarch

Currently I'm packaging modem-manager-gui [1] which contains such a translation. I have dropped it from the package for the time being, but I like to get it back soon.

Before I file bugs against the packages mentioned above, it would be the most painless way to add the appropriate folders to the "filesystem" package.

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047062

Comment 1 Ondrej Vasik 2014-01-03 19:38:35 UTC
filesystem usually creates and owns the localization directories for iso 639 and iso 3166 locales, however, we already have a list of exceptions ( https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/filesystem.git/tree/lang-exceptions ) ... I'll add that one in next rawhide build of filesystem package.

Comment 2 Mario Blättermann 2014-01-09 12:15:10 UTC
(In reply to Ondrej Vasik from comment #1)
> I'll add that one in next rawhide build of filesystem package.

Is it possible to backport that to f20 also?

Comment 3 Ondrej Vasik 2014-01-09 14:26:02 UTC
It wouldn't change much, as this is just about the "ownership" ... therefore it doesn't make sense to me. Could you please give me an expanation why to do F20 update for it?

Comment 4 Ondrej Vasik 2014-01-10 09:40:31 UTC
Done in rawhide, filesystem-3.2-23.fc21.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.