Bug 1049116 (ns2) - Review Request: ns2 - The Network Simulator
Summary: Review Request: ns2 - The Network Simulator
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: ns2
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: OTcl TCLCL
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-01-07 03:52 UTC by Mosaab Alzoubi
Modified: 2020-08-10 00:48 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-08-10 00:48:20 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Patch to allow 64 bit builds (2.05 KB, patch)
2014-07-30 12:15 UTC, Seng Jea
no flags Details | Diff

Description Mosaab Alzoubi 2014-01-07 03:52:05 UTC
Spec URL: http://ojuba.org/oji/SPECS/ns2.spec
SRPM URL: http://ojuba.org/oji/SRPMS/ns2-2.35-1.oji.fc19.src.rpm
Description:
Ns is a discrete event simulator targeted at networking research. Ns provides
substantial support for simulation of TCP, routing, and multicast protocols
over wired and wireless (local and satellite) networks.

Fedora Account System Username: moceap

Comment 1 Mosaab Alzoubi 2014-02-11 15:44:19 UTC
Rebuild on F20, and re-upload due to failed past upload.

Spec URL: http://ojuba.org/oji/SPECS/ns2.spec
SRPM URL: http://ojuba.org/oji/SRPMS/ns2-2.35-1.fc20.src.rpm

Comment 2 Seng Jea 2014-07-30 12:15:11 UTC
Created attachment 922542 [details]
Patch to allow 64 bit builds

Current ns2.spec file does not successfully build in 64 bit environment because it can't find the libraries. Patch attached fixes this and patch needs to be included in the .spec file:

Patch0: ns-allinone-2.35-otcl.patch

%prep
%patch1 -p2

Comment 3 Mosaab Alzoubi 2014-08-21 12:04:00 UTC
Thanx Alot Seng.

I'll merege them soon, Patch These too :

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047497
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047702

They are requires :)

Comment 4 Mosaab Alzoubi 2014-10-03 21:46:12 UTC
(In reply to Mosaab Alzoubi from comment #3)
> Thanx Alot Seng.
> 
> I'll merege them soon, Patch These too :
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047497
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047702
> 
> They are requires :)

No need ^_^

Comment 5 Mosaab Alzoubi 2014-10-05 00:53:17 UTC
- Support 64Bit by Seng Jea.
- Fix configure lines.
- General tweaks.


Spec: http://ojuba.org/test/ns2.spec
Srpm: http://ojuba.org/test/ns2-2.35-2.oj35.src.rpm

Comment 6 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2015-03-10 02:38:35 UTC
Suggestion: for the MANDEST variable, it might be simpler to simply set it as an argument to make:
  make MANDEST=%{_mandir}

Suggestion: use 'make -C <dir> ...' instead of pushd, popd everywhere.

New guidelines say that %license has to be used for LICENSES, COPYRIGHTS.

Looks reasonable, but I'll wait until dependencies are resolved before taking further steps.

Comment 7 Mosaab Alzoubi 2015-03-10 10:20:38 UTC
What is this (%license) ?? I checked Packaging License wiki ...

Suggestion will be taken .

Thank You .

Comment 9 Mosaab Alzoubi 2015-03-10 12:45:56 UTC
I'm already in these lists , but I missed this discus.

Comment 10 Mosaab Alzoubi 2015-04-04 13:42:15 UTC
- Better way to fix MANDEST
- Better way to detect DIRs on make commands
- Use %%make_install
- Remove Group tag
- Use %%license macro

Spec: http://ojuba.org/test/ns2.spec
Srpm: http://ojuba.org/test/ns2-2.35-3.oj35.src.rpm

Comment 11 Package Review 2020-07-10 00:49:02 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 12 Package Review 2020-08-10 00:48:20 UTC
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.