Bug 1057081 - [RFE] Tree view and tabbed view are out of sync
Summary: [RFE] Tree view and tabbed view are out of sync
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 987953
Alias: None
Product: oVirt
Classification: Retired
Component: ovirt-engine-webadmin
Version: 3.4
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Alexander Wels
QA Contact: bugs@ovirt.org
URL:
Whiteboard: ux
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-01-23 12:42 UTC by Shai Revivo
Modified: 2023-09-14 01:57 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-04-17 16:59:14 UTC
oVirt Team: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
screenshot (132.27 KB, image/png)
2014-01-23 12:42 UTC, Shai Revivo
no flags Details
screen-cast: refresh System tree (1.10 MB, video/ogg)
2014-01-24 16:52 UTC, Einav Cohen
no flags Details
screen-cast: create a network (1.31 MB, video/ogg)
2014-03-24 16:30 UTC, Einav Cohen
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
oVirt gerrit 26161 0 master MERGED webadmin: System tree refresh Never

Description Shai Revivo 2014-01-23 12:42:39 UTC
Created attachment 854368 [details]
screenshot

Description of problem:
working on the system as admin (creating network for example) will cause inconsistency between tree to tabs.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.create new network
2.expand tree for network
3.

Actual results:
tab view show all networks and tree doesnt 

Expected results:
tree & tabs are the same

Additional info:
full refresh (F5) resolve it.

Comment 1 Einav Cohen 2014-01-24 16:52:35 UTC
Created attachment 855073 [details]
screen-cast: refresh System tree

Comment 2 Einav Cohen 2014-01-24 18:00:13 UTC
- left-pane tree is not being automatically refreshed (tree refresh is a fairly heavy operation) - therefore, changes done by the GUI user as well as changes done by other users are not automatically reflected.

- you don't need to refresh the entire browser's window/tab (F5) to workaround - we have the "refresh" button in the System tree section for that (see attachment 855073 [details])

Comment 3 Shai Revivo 2014-01-24 19:48:26 UTC
(In reply to Einav Cohen from comment #2)
> - left-pane tree is not being automatically refreshed (tree refresh is a
> fairly heavy operation) - therefore, changes done by the GUI user as well as
> changes done by other users are not automatically reflected.
> 
> - you don't need to refresh the entire browser's window/tab (F5) to
> workaround - we have the "refresh" button in the System tree section for
> that (see attachment 855073 [details])

i tried, it doesn't work.
please try it on the above described scenario.
in addition, i would say that we need to choose ... why tree + tabs ?

Comment 4 Einav Cohen 2014-03-24 16:30:14 UTC
Created attachment 878120 [details]
screen-cast: create a network

Comment 5 Einav Cohen 2014-03-24 17:37:20 UTC
(In reply to Shai Revivo from comment #3)
> (In reply to Einav Cohen from comment #2)
> > - left-pane tree is not being automatically refreshed (tree refresh is a
> > fairly heavy operation) - therefore, changes done by the GUI user as well as
> > changes done by other users are not automatically reflected.
> > 
> > - you don't need to refresh the entire browser's window/tab (F5) to
> > workaround - we have the "refresh" button in the System tree section for
> > that (see attachment 855073 [details])
> 
> i tried, it doesn't work.
> please try it on the above described scenario.

the above described scenario doesn't mention clicking on 'the "refresh" button in the System tree section'. if you will do that, you will find out that the newly-added network appears in the tree (see attachment 878120 [details]). Currently, clicking on the "refresh" button collapses the tree, so you need to expand the 'Networks' tree-node (after clicking on "refresh") in order to see the newly-added network - this usability issue is documented in bug 1072505. 

the general improvement request (i.e. automatically refreshing the tree / keeping the tree sync'd without having to click on any "refresh" button) is already documented in bug 987953 and in bug 879077 - is there any reason to not close this BZ on a duplicate of one of them?

> in addition, i would say that we need to choose ... why tree + tabs ?

I am not sure that I understand this sentence - do you mean that we don't need both the tree and the main-tabs in the system and we can get rid of one of them? we already have a similar request in bug 1011186 that is questioning the necessity of the tree in the GUI.

Comment 6 Einav Cohen 2014-04-17 16:59:14 UTC
marking as duplicate of bug 987953. please re-open if necessary, but make sure to refer to comment #5 first. thanks.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 987953 ***

Comment 7 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 01:57:46 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.