Would like to be able to add/remove multiple disks to a guest or attach disks as LUN pass through at a time instead of one at a time.
Since there's a customer ticket associated with this BZ, I'm splitting it up to several BZs to increase visibility on the items RHEV already supports, and to ease the tracking of the ones it doesn't.
(In reply to Allon Mureinik from comment #9) > Since there's a customer ticket associated with this BZ, I'm splitting it up > to several BZs to increase visibility on the items RHEV already supports, > and to ease the tracking of the ones it doesn't. After the cloning of bug 1193359, bug 1193365 and bug 1193367, this BZ will be used ONLY for tracking the functionality of adding several Direct LUNs in a single screen/flow/whatever.
(In reply to Allon Mureinik from comment #10) > (In reply to Allon Mureinik from comment #9) > > Since there's a customer ticket associated with this BZ, I'm splitting it up > > to several BZs to increase visibility on the items RHEV already supports, > > and to ease the tracking of the ones it doesn't. > > After the cloning of bug 1193359, bug 1193365 and bug 1193367, this BZ will > be used ONLY for tracking the functionality of adding several Direct LUNs in > a single screen/flow/whatever. Looks like we can close this bug? All the above were implemented in 3.5.0.
(In reply to Yaniv Kaul from comment #11) > (In reply to Allon Mureinik from comment #10) > > (In reply to Allon Mureinik from comment #9) > > > Since there's a customer ticket associated with this BZ, I'm splitting it up > > > to several BZs to increase visibility on the items RHEV already supports, > > > and to ease the tracking of the ones it doesn't. > > > > After the cloning of bug 1193359, bug 1193365 and bug 1193367, this BZ will > > be used ONLY for tracking the functionality of adding several Direct LUNs in > > a single screen/flow/whatever. > > Looks like we can close this bug? All the above were implemented in 3.5.0. The aforementioned bugs are for removing, attaching and detaching several direct luns, respectively. This one is for ADDING several direct luns. We can close it if we decide it's not interesting to solve, but it is definitely not implemented.
Didn't you say in Bug 1193365 that this is already resolved and therefore this ticket should be closed as well?
(In reply to Yaniv Dary from comment #13) > Didn't you say in Bug 1193365 that this is already resolved and therefore > this ticket should be closed as well? No. Bug 1193365 is about ATTACHING several EXISTING direct luns to an EXISTING vm. This bug is about taking several luns from the storage and registering as direct luns in the engine.